Supreme Court Justices Give Heated Dissent Over Latest Racial Bias Ruling
Supreme Court Justices Give Heated Dissent Over Latest Racial Bias Ruling
The Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal of Tony Clark, a death row inmate alleging prosecutors excluded Black jurors from his trial.
While everyone was going up about the Supreme Court’s block on President Joe Biden’s student loan debt relief plan, the court passed another decision right under our noses. According to NBC News, the court refused to hear the appeal of a Black death row inmate who alleged his jury was picked based on race.
Tony Clark was convicted on murder charges and sentenced to death in the killing of a 13-year-old boy during the robbery of a convenience store back in 2014. His appeal claimed that during the jury selection for his trial, prosecutors unlawfully sought to strike Black jurors based solely on race. That would be in direct violation of the Court’s 1986 ruling that potential jurors can’t be excluded based on race. But alas, Clark’s trial was composed of 11 white people and one Black person.
Mmm yes, I enjoy seeing my values reduced to "heated dissent" by a fascist minority that gamed the system.
Dude they will complain about our screams as we suffocate in their "Assisted Suicide Chambers for the mentally ill"
Ultimately I agree with the Affirmative Action ruling. The Equal Protections clause doesn't say, "All racism is bad except some racism for the right reasons, that's okay." it just says there is to be no discrimination based on race.
Affirmative Action was racism with good intentions.
I don't think you understand what racism means. AA was there to help even the playing field.
I'm white, and I went to a HBCU on a minority scholarship. AA works both ways but you're not ready to consider this.
It's still wrong. I'm perfectly happy to consider all aspects of AA, but so long as any part of it stands on determining someone's admission based on race it will always be racism and I'm not in favor of racism for any reason.
I also agree with the ruling. Aid need to be based on economic standing without regard for skin color.
The decision wasn't even specifically anti-AA, it was specifically anti-racism.
The 3 left-wing 'judges' are just whiny babies.
That's strange, I can't seem to hear any whining coming from them over the sound of Roberts' incessant crying about people pointing out the illegitimacy of his court while he blows his nose with hundred dollar bills given to him by Republican mega donors
Yeah, like how that one left-wing judge whined like a baby about drinking beer.
Wait, that wasn't one of the left-wing judges.
Oh, I know. It was the two who whined like babies about getting gifts from people who had cases in front of the court.
No... those weren't the left-wing judges either.
Not sure which judges you're talking about, I guess.
Thanks for your positive contribution to the fedeverse, troll.
Hahaha incel baby fuck off
This is some classic Reddit response here.
