Is it possible to listen to artists who are terrible people without feeling guilty?
Is it possible to listen to artists who are terrible people without feeling guilty?
Specifically Marilyn Manson and Kanye West. Am I overthinking this?
Is it possible to listen to artists who are terrible people without feeling guilty?
Specifically Marilyn Manson and Kanye West. Am I overthinking this?
I find it depends on how they get compensated.
It depends, mostly on yourself and how you feel about it. Most artists have shown some form of shitty behaviour - Dave Grohl cheated on his wife for example. Is that enough to stop listening to his music? Probably not. Kanye West released a song called "Heil Hitler"...is that enough? Probably, but does that also count for his older songs? You decide. No one else can.
Absolutely. With all forms of art, I feel this is an extension of the Death of the Author concept, in that you separate the art from the artist, and it has less to do with what the artist intended and more to do with your take and interpretation of something, good or bad, and it's effect and meaning for you.
For example, due to my childhood and lots of past trauma, I harbor some deeply resentful and hateful feelings toward Christians and Christianity in general. However, there are some Christian rock and metal bands I have always loved, and a lot of their music doesn't always scream religion at me. I appreciate and enjoy some of these still today, despite the fact they ultimately are representing something I detest. The way I enjoy it and what it means to me is different from what they intended.
I can't, personally. Same with any art. Kanye can get fucked. Manson can get fucked. Pantera can get fucked. Neil Gaiman can get fucked.
Some are harder to walk away from than others though. Sandman and Death were two of the first comic book characters that I ever got to read complete stories of and not just random back issues. But I'll never be able to look at another Gaiman creation again without thinking about everything.
Others are easier to leave behind. Bands like Pantera always came across as macho dickheads that beat up kids for listening to heavy metal back in school anyway. So I feel nothing saying nazi metalheads fuck off
What's the problem with Pantera? I know almost nothing about them aside from an album plus a few singles
Phil Anselmo, singer of Pantera, in 2016:
And seeing that made me feel stupid for never picking up on the white power undertones in their music before. Honestly it's made me feel something not good about a lot of metal bands in general since, considering that this very year, Metallica, Slayer and Pantera were still happily touring alongside each other as opening acts for Black Sabbath's 20th final tour.
I've never felt guilty for consuming media of people who have done bad things; it's not that it's not important to have integrity, I just assume everyone I could consume media from has and does, and the difference is that I'll either never know, or don't know yet.
We can't just throw away historical and culturally significant works because the creator(s) are terrible, in part because broken, complicated, terrible people make these works because that's where the creative energy is.
If they get even a cent from you, then you are funding their crap. Also whatever you don't like about them will certainly be part of their art. If that doesn't bother you, then sure, enjoy what you want.
Explain Manson pls
I don't think so. You're always going to remember. You can be good at pushing it down. But it's always going to be in the back of your mind. Just depends how skilled you are at ignoring that part of your mind really.
Sure. Just don't pay. I listen to some very questionable or morally disgusting songs because I like the music. And I personally never care for the author's life story. I don't ask who builds my car either.
What's wrong with Marilyn Manson that wasn't 20 years ago?
Yes. It would be necessary to live a modern life, given almost everything we use/eat comes from some unethical source. We abstain from the things that are important to us, according to our values. Lyrically if a song does not itself promote [terrible thing] then the music can be separated from an artist that does.
However if it is important to you that your listening does not generate income for those people, don't listen to their music in apps (eg Spotify, who pays based on plays), nor on their official YT channels (which are likely monetised).
Also, be mindful that playing/listening to it around others is a form of 'conspicuous consumption', one of many ways our actions become 'Word of Mouth' advertising. This may lead others to believe you support the artists specifically, and depending on their values, they may be derisive or hostile. (Or, they agree with [terrible thing] and believe you are alike.)
I’m sorry I should read more English literature, but I’m a bit in a hurry right now.
Of course, just don't give them money. Unless you're listening to the musical equivalent of "The Eternal Jew"/"American Sniper", in which the content was not only made by hateful, possibly hellbound people but is also actively trying to morph your ideology to be more like theirs, what's the danger?
That's how I view it too. If you can consume something without financing further harm then the author doesn't matter. Already own a Niel Gaiman book? Feel free to keep reading it. Pirated some metal music from a band that turned out to be neo-nazis? Go for it. Want to read Lovecraft? He's long dead and his estate doesn't seem to be supporting racism, so buy as much as you want. Want to check out Mein Kampf from the library? I will have questions when you return it, but you aren't hurting anyone by reading it. Just understand the mindset that made them bad people and don't let them sway your outlook to match.
My mom got me a copy of Mein Kampf when I was little (I asked, I was curious about what this Hitler guy used to yap about) and she never even questioned it, lol. She really had faith in little ol' me. 😅
Do a hecking piracy. Problem solved.
Ripping stuff from YouTube for personal use isn't even illegal.
Sometimes it can be difficult to separate the art from the artist, particularly when the artist in question is especially vile.
Just pirate their music. Don't stream it, don't go to their concerts, don't buy and wear their merch. As long as you're not financially contributing to them then I don't think there's any issue.
It also, like CaptainPedantic said, matters what they're singing about. If the artist has shitty views but doesn't present them in their music that's one thing but there's no ethical way to listen to something called Heil Hitler.
Sometimes it can be difficult to separate the art from the artist, particularly when the artist in question is especially vile.
I often bring up Death of the Artist, but with books and music I have an especially hard time. Authors, in particular, struggle to keep their works views and politics out of their books; the same is true with musicians, perhaps to a lesser extent.
It does make me worry about the subconscious influences of listening or reading them.
I think that if "death of the artist" was applicable to any piece of art, then the art would therefore be the equivalent of AI art.
Art by it's very nature is influenced by someone's views and beliefs.
The only possible exception is that some artists may drastically change their views later and even denounce previous work.
Edit: I also think it's worth pointing out that you can like the way someone represents/expresses their viewpoints even if you disagree with said viewpoints, you just have to be aware of the viewpoints presence and potential effects.
You can still stream it; just use a modded app like YouTube Music ReVanced to block ads and the artist's record label won't get a penny from you.
(Unless of course Google pays royalties by view count rather than ad revenue. Not entirely sure how that works. Just wanted to point out that YTM ReVanced is a thing)
I don’t think it bad to still enjoy their music. If the music is good then its good regardless if the author is good or not. I understand not wanting to support them however. So though I don’t think its bad to still listen to them I understand how others fell differently
Yup. It's very easy indeed.
Pirate the fuck out of their stuff, enjoy, repeat.
Edit: the exception is when the the fuckery is in the music/art.
The most politically incorrect truth is this: People are not good or bad, individual people do a variety of good and bad things. Mister Rogers told his gay friend to stay in the closet and marry a woman. Hitler banned animal cruelty. We don't like to talk about these things, but it's a true principle and a useful one to live by.
I mean... technically, yes, we all do good and bad stuff.
But you can't say Hitler was a good person just because he was against animal cruelty. I don't think any person out there is cartoonishly evil to a point they never did anything good - that doesn't make those evil persons not evil.
It's not politically incorrect at all. 'Good' and 'bad' are just too simplistic ways to interpret our complex world. It's idealistic to try and put people in such simple categories, and it leads to a delutional worldview.
The only 'politically incorrect' part is that some people might jump down your throat for pointing out things about Hitler which weren't terrible, because unfortunately neo-Nazis abuse this rhetoric as a wolfwhistle or for whitewashing. But as long as you're clearly not doing that, there's nothing politically incorrect with saying Hitler drank water.
Dont support them by buying their stuff. Just pirate their music. For me personally, i dont follow artist in anyway shape or form. I have bigger problem to worry about. I just listen to songs i like and go on with my day.
I'd say it depends on WHY you like the art. Does it tie into the toxic or reprehensible traits of the artist? Was the artist trying to send a toxic or reprehensible message with this art?
If not, then it's just a matter of ensuring that your enjoyment of the art doesn't translate into support for the artist. Or, at least, that it doesn't cross your personal line of support for the artist.
So, for example, does the Kanye music you like have nazi themes or messaging? Far as I'm aware, no, the nazi-ism is just his newest shit, so you're probably fine as long as you're not streaming from Spotify or YouTube, or otherwise giving him revenue.
Yes. It's called seperating the artist from the art.
Yes, but there is a line at which point the art can no longer be seen.
For example, I can't listen to the lost prophets any more.
Very curious how old-time Kanye fans feel haha
In my mind, as long as you're not listening to a horrific song (like Kanye's Heil Hitler), and as long as they're not seeing a penny from you listening to them, then I don't think it's a huge issue. You're getting something from them while screwing them out of some money.
like Kanye's Heil Hitler
Wait, what??? I thought this was a joke, so I just looked it up. I have no words...
You and me both.
Is Marilyn Manson a dick? I thought they were just weird.
He groomed and allegedly raped an 18 year old.
Ok, fuck him.
Didn’t this turn out to be false?
Nah, he's always gone beyond weird. Even back before the band got famous, he was a major asshole to people and abusive. If you can find people that were in the scene back then, it wasn't even secret; some of the early fans were proud if he did something shitty to them.
I always assume most popular artists in general are horrible people, so yeah...
YMMV. There is no universal answer to this question. None of us separate the artist entirely from the work and thus our enjoyment of it. I think of it in video game terms. Every artist has a power bar. They can get hit a couple of times and can still be tolerated when they're in the yellow. But once we're in the red zone and the character starts getting translucent or is flashing I'm out. This is all very subjective though.
Marylin Manson went red for me and I scrubbed the songs I liked from my playlists. Michael Jackson also. But I continue to listen to The Smiths/Morrissey in spite of Morrissey's politics. I still enjoy Pink Floyd although Walters and Gilmore are profoundly unlikable characters and Walter's politics rub me the wrong way a lot of the time.
In the age of streaming, there isn't a lot of money going to the artist. You're not really supporting them financially if you enjoy their music in spite of any a-holery, moral or criminal, they may have committed. If you get something out of it, continue to do so. If it feels yucky then I'm gonna guess one more hit is putting the character in the red. And if you paid for the music/album, the "damage" is already done.
I'm glad I was never a big fan of Kanye's œuvre so I don't have to wrestle with this question about him. I think he would have done enough to drain his power bar thrice over and thus it's game over for me. I wish he had more well meaning people around him who could help him to protect himself from himself.
When you said video game you brought to mind a broader context for me. We often associate “a name” (musician, CEO, comedian, etc.) with a brand. But when you truly think of the number of people and entire industry involved in producing said art, it becomes a somewhat different question. Not necessarily easier to answer, and I really like your health bar analogy. I think to some extent it depends on what you personally are getting out of your interaction with the product.
Always a fascinating philosophical question to ponder.
Well there is enjoying an artists music and there is supporting an artist and defending them. But you have to decide when to cut off an, "abusive relationship". I can hold a person and artist in separate spaces. A love a lot of music, literature, art that was created by terrible people but try and avoid giving those people my attention and money. Other people have said that while an artist creates, its not their art, it's ours. Perfect example is Harry Potter books. I would say that people's experience and enjoyment of the books is not JK. Now the tough decision comes when you want something created by an artist/company and you have to support them for your own enjoyment. That is the line we all consider. Just trust yourself to find it. Nothing is truly just in this world but we shouldn't stop trying.
The bigger problem with Rowling is how she rubs it in everyone's face that any money going towards her is spent on hate speech/groups.
So you are asking other people if its ok to be spineless. Looks like you already have the answer for that and didn't liked it.
The artist is smarter than you.
The earthworm considers the hawk to be vile.
The hawk is a terrible digger and crawler. The hawk can't appreciate composted vegetable scraps. Those big flappy wings and dangling claws, so ugly.
My point is, the world is large and you are small. So be humble, you are probably wrong about everything.