Skip Navigation
62 comments
  • I think it's on purpose because Andor can't have a real anti-fascist, anti-empire message if Darth Vader is present. In the dynamics of real empire, Vader should be some kind of manager/general like Krenic. He can't be a 6'-4" cyborg who is the best at being a pilot and the strongest magic space warlock to ever exist. The foundational narrative of Star Wars is about how empires are created by bad people who are indoctrinated by magic space warlocks. This message was driven so far deep in the lore that literal space genes cause people to be almost deterministically evil or good. You can't be materially anti-empire when the empire is actually magic. Being a revolutionary against empire means something and it's not waiting for the prophecy of a good guy with magic space genes to save us all.

    The best thing Andor can do is forget the Skywalker bullshit, pretend it doesn't exist, and flesh out the Empire as being founded in material exploitation. That is something they have been doing so far. If Andor has to go find a magic Jedi mcguffin or protect the royal space gene bloodline, it's cooked. Luckily we know how this ends so they don't have much room for that bullshit.

    • I rewatched Rogue One after watching season 1 of Andor again before the 2nd season and in Rogue one Andor (the character) mentions the jedi, which means he knows about them by Rogue One which kinda scares me for this season. Think it's gonna turn out that Luthen is a jedi, I hope not and that line in Rogue One goes on to not make any sense.

  • I'd watch it because it's good, not because it's Star Wars fan fiction.

    protip: George Lucas only made 6 Star Wars movies.

    • The prequels get too much credit. People have nostalgia glasses on for what were bad movies. The same complaints today about the Disney trilogy (except for the chud complaints) were made about the prequels.

      Like how you gonna have Samuel L. Jackson in your movie and have him be completely wooden? There's multiple academy award winners and nominees in there, yet their acting sucks. It's because they had a shitty director with Lucas not letting anyone else have input or telling him no.

      I was still a kid, but older going into my teens when they came out. I remember the reactions people had, comparing them to the original trilogy. My point is, chuds get themselves worked up over a franchise that's been objectively terrible as though they were the pinnacle of modern cinema. They need to just shut the fuck up and enjoy the slop.

      • I was 22 when TPM was released and my friends and I were so excited to go see a new Star Wars movie. The first one came out the year I was born so even though I'm nearly 50 now I never got to see the originals in that form and this was a huge moment for Scifi nerds like us. We got together all the old crew, we had all graduated college at that point and didn't see each other often and this was like an event. We piled into the theater...

        When it ended we all just sat there confused. No one wanted to be the one to admit that the movie fucking sucked. It sucked so hard I was embarrassed to be there. We all looked at each other like uh.... was... that good? Finally someone was like "I wanted to leave since the underwater scenes"

        The prequels suck. The only reason anyone like them is that they were kids when they came out and it tickles the nostalgia centers of their brains. The next two were slightly better but only very slightly. I will never watch them again.

      • I don't know, I'll defend the prequels a little bit. They're still bad movies, but they're bad in a way that was... interesting? Besides pod racing, which rips, they had some actual political ideas and were at least set against a backdrop of a liberal democracy descending into fascism.

        A manufactured war creates a crisis and goads a small group of bourgeois senatorial elites to concentrate power in the hands of a unitary executive who uses that power to abolish the liberal democracy. The sequels don't have anything resembling politics, just vibes.

        George absolutely needed reined in but he did have some good ideas in the all the slop. But I'm willing to give him way more slack for modeling the rebels in the OT after the Viet Cong than maybe should.

    • And Andor is better than any of those six

  • Darth Vader's entire story and then some has been told. Also the threat he once represented is entirely diminished due to his presence in pop culture for almost 50 years. Dude is printed on children's bedsheets and stuff, any excitement from Darth Vader has been wrung entirely dry. Like Bela Lugosi's Dracula, that shit was scary in 1932 but it didn't take long for it to be the way to depixr a vampire in a silly way. If you want a threatening villain to be threatening you don't use them as often as possible cause that means the heroes have to beat or escape them more often, trek did it with the borg as well.

    Plus tonally, Vader doesn't fit into Andor at all. Most of Star Wars is focused around grandiose melodrama. Anakin was never relatable at any point. Fucking Mon Mothma at this point has waaaaay more character depth than Darth Vader because what she's going through makes sense and the way she reacts to things emotionally is similar to what a human would do or feel. Anaking never reacted to a single piece of outside stimuli in a way that remotely resembles human behavior. His emotions are dictated by plot necessity at every turn. Andor is doing this thing where it's not trying to be Flash Gordon or whatever bullshit the clone wars was trying to rip off which seems to be the gold standard of star wars for these fucking geeks. A trash kids show.

62 comments