Stop Ruining It!

Now listen, a giant bird would still be hella intimidating. Even a smol bird, when angered, can and will draw blood
- Birds are tiny knife airplanes.
  
  No, they are the government's drones !birdsarentreal@lemmy.world
- See: goose
  See, also: swan
- some people just havent been chased by a chicken, duck or anything similar, so they think dinosaurs having feathers would make them less scary
- My chicken has declared that she is a t-rex, and all robins and squirrels must respect her authoritah.
  It's fucking hilarious to watch, but then you realize that she really is a giant, angry predator to anything the size of a robin. Imagine a chicken that's about thirty feet tall, with claws the size of a small sword and a wingspan that is big enough to look like a wall. And it's charging at you, making noises like an angry teakettle, its beak sharp and hard, while its eyes drill into you so that you know feathered death is inescapable
- That's why I always compliment the sparrows.

There never was any evidence they were scavengers and numerous fossil examples that T. Rex did infact hunt large herbivores for food. The most notable being a T. Rex's tooth found in a hadrosaur's spine, and the wound showed signs of healing meaning the hadrosaur was alive when it was bit and survived the encounter.
"We not only have a broken-off tooth embedded in the bone of another animal, but the bone has healed over the wound, and a nasty wound it was too," said David Burnham at Palm Beach Museum of Natural History in Florida. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jul/15/t-rex-tooth-embedded-prey-dinosaur
Other evidence includes fossilized footprints suggesting a group of T. Rex of differing ages stalking their prey. This isn't to say the T. Rex wouldn't take advantage of a dead animal and opportunistically scavenge, as any large predator will today, but this probably wasn't their primary means of getting food.
- and also there is no evidence of feathers, but it is very probable they had some, like just small filaments on top of their heads and necks or something similar. There are some Trex skin impressions, but theyre all on parts where there wouldnt be feathers anyway
- That's all very interesting, but I can't get past the socks with sandals. T-Rex is dead to me.

Don't try to convince me that a 12 meters long, 8 tons heavy cassowary with mouth full of 20 cm long teeth and eyes that have better visual acuity than hawks or eagles, being able to see you from 6 km away, while also having excellent sense of smell, is not scary.
Fluffy or not, I wouldn't want to be closer than about 10 km to a hungry Tyrannosaurus.
- If it's any consolation trex was an animal accustomed to hunting truck sized triceratops, eating you would be like eating a single potato chip; very unsatisfying.
- Right? I'm sufficiently leery around chickens.
- How do we know anything about their visual acuity or sense of smell?
  
  It's amazing how much you can infer from the shape and size of the various features of a bone.
  For eyesight, simple physics: bigger is better. That's why we build huge telescopes, they collect more light and have better angular resolution than small ones, and the same goes for eyes. In addition, birds in general have very good eyesight and dinos are very closely related to birds. For T. rex, they also have narrow snouts allowing for excellent binocular vision.
  Smell is similar—big nasal cavities allow for big olfactory organs, meaning a lot of receptors that can bind with airborne molecules.
  
  We can infer a lot from the size and position of its eye sockets. The eyes were position so as to be forward facing, not side facing like an herbivores.
  This article has a really good pocture in it showing you a direct view of the eye sockets from the snout. Its cheekbones and nostrils are designed so that it's visual field easily would clear them, giving it binocular vision like ours. The study that article discusses used fossils to model what dinosaur faces would have looked like, then examined their visual field. The trex had around a 55 degree binocular range, which is larger than many predatory birds that we know to have excellent vision over long distances. It's eyes were also gigantic, allowing for a lot of light to get in.
  As for sense of smell, I don't know how we know about it; I think we assume it did because it's nostrils were also huge, and because most animals today have good senses of smell, meaning it's a good adaptation to have and likely would be present on the largest land predator to ever exist.

Gen alpha is trying to get everyone to wear socks with sandals
- As a millennial, it will always be a no. It will forever have a Middle Aged Maths Teacher on Holiday vibe to it for me.
  
  Meh, middle aged math's teacher sounding like a solid reliable job right now. Nothing to shy from.
- I think gen alpha has become increasingly aware of foot fetishes so they avoid showing their feet. I have a 15 year old and she never wears open toe shoes in public.
  
  I very much agree that it's related to the recent extreme sexualization of feet
  
  well gen alpha are babies, 15 year olds are gen z
  but also yeah society is getting more puritan and it’s bad
  
  Well that explains why Quentin wants to retire after his next film.
- would have to start with socks that are split between the big toe and the index? toe, like a ninja, for starters.. but even then still not comfortable or safe. might as well wear crocs or slippers.
  
  I think most sandals don't have a divider between the big toe and the rest. I think of sandals as any casual, open-toed shoes.
  
  I typically hand grown adults wearing crocs a card with the suicide hotline number on it because it clearly a desperate cry for help.

Honestly they look way cooler with feathers. Older models of how dinosaurs looked were so bland by comparison.
- There's that one drawing of a medium-sized raptor that basically looks like a sparrow and to date that's the coolest depiction of a dinosaur i have seen.
  IT LOOKS SO REAL
  edit: found it: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/8f/6a/76/8f6a764e115095a9b7a0c236fac542e2.png
- Also if you spend time with chickens, you realize without a doubt that birds = dinosaurs. Especially if you raise them from chicks, their awkward teenage stage is like half bird, half lizard anyway.

Scientists: no evidence that dinosaurs did not have pubes
- not sure if it counts, but there are some fossils that show exactly how dinosaurs sat, and im pretty sure there was nothing resembling pubes on the butt part
  
  They probably shaved