Aspartame Sweetener Possible Carcinogen Says W.H..O
Aspartame Sweetener Possible Carcinogen Says W.H..O
www.reuters.com
Exclusive: WHO's cancer research agency to say aspartame sweetener a possible carcinogen -sources
Isn’t everything, though?
4 comments
-
-
Meh. If you ignore every cancer long enough you don't have to worry about any of them.
We need a neutral body that is willing to treat it like binary. Does it increase the odds of cancer above a certain threshold given situations that normal users would deal with? Then yes it causes cancer. Else no. I am sick of these governing bodies using weasel words to defend their claims. Statements like this make people do averaging. Suddenly these super hypothetical situations are rated as deadily as smoking.
-
I think a binary system leaves no room for nuance, and therefore, no ability for consumers to make informed decisions. What about a scale instead? 1 could mean “Cancerous? Technically, but don’t worry about it unless you’re mainlining it 23 hours a day, dude.” And 10 could mean, “Seriously, make sure your will is updated.”
-
Like cooking meat creates carcinogens if any of it is burned.
At some point, who the fuck cares. I have to die of something.
-
-
Aspartame hasn’t been found to be in the probable category yet. This designation doesn’t mean much.
Working overnight and eating red meat are in a higher category according to the WHO.