Gotta laugh how fash think people aren't having babies because of Jewish mind control when in reality the people are fucking broke and childcare in the USA is a luxury lmao
if it was feasible during the Black Death it's feasible now. you just have to adjust your expectations of your child's material conditions from infancy through adulthood. If you go through with it you should also accept the likelihood that their life will be short and bad.
I wouldn’t call the Black Death feasible, but more “miserable” and 2/3 of crackerland died, so many people with kids end up with no kids, and many kids ended up raising themselves. So comparing crackerland’s Black Plague to modern conditions is like comparing apples and oranges.
I think the whole "americana is when you move out of the home when you're 18/graduate" is probably the most devious social engineering done by capitalism.
Families are support networks, even if you don't have a kid yourself someone else would have and you can focus on supporting them.
From a south asian islamic perspective, I don't know why crackers have a culture of hating their parents and fucking them over later in life with retirement homes (it's probably just capitalism tho).
From a south asian islamic perspective, I don't know why crackers have a culture of hating their parents and fucking them over later in life with retirement homes
Speaking as a cracker that came from neglectful parenting; It's because their parents hated them and fucked them over early in life. Many of us had to be parents to our own parents while they took everything from us.
The thing is that most people have no other option. If you work full time, live far away from your parents, and have other responsibilities, how can you take care of them? Getting good home health workers is very hard and expensive. Letting the parents move in may be impractical due to housing costs, and may also ruin your marriage if you have one. It's put them in a nursing home or let them die alone and not be found for days, usually.
From a south asian islamic perspective, I don't know why crackers have a culture of hating their parents and fucking them over later in life with retirement homes (it's probably just capitalism tho).
I think the whole "americana is when you move out of the home when you're 18/graduate" is probably the most devious social engineering done by capitalism.
You answered your own question. Their parents boot them out of the house when they're 18, so there's a degree of resentment that carries over as the parents grow old. There's also a reverse dynamic where the parents treat their kids like complete shit since "well, they're going to be out of the house at 18 anyways." Here's my impression dealing with cultures that haven't had their family dynamic get ruined by Anglo culture: there's a mutual understanding by the parents and the kids that the parents need to rely on their kids later in life, so the parents can't burn bridges lest the kids decide to just fuck off and abandon the parents. The kids also can't burn bridges since the parents are their main gateway to their extended family. The lack of generational housing also means the kids are unable to help their parents too. What happens to parents who are old enough that they get completely tired from buying groceries? Obviously, their kids aren't going to fly half-way across the country to buy groceries from Walmart and fly half-way back to their homes.
Anglo culture is perversely anti-family. You have dictatorial parents who raise ingrate kids and ingrate kids who grow up to become dictatorial parents.
I mean yeah a lot of people are out there doing it lol
Definitely not ideal, and my partner and I aren't going to for a variety of reasons, but given adequate money and a strong family support system you can avoid most of the problems poorer people will face
Due to an oddity of health insurance and drug manufacturer coupons we have our maximum out of pocket hit without spending any money.
If not for that, our baby would have cost us $40,000 out of pocket, out of about a $300,000 bill, in 1 year. That's pregnancy, screenings, birth, and a single cold from the first day of day care. The cold was $200,000 for a week in the hospital.
It's certainly doable but much more difficult, both parents must work now - nevermind single parents. Community is shot in general and families are spread out partially due to economic effects, people leave because they go where work is, the churn means roots are harder to put down and neoliberal individualism has kind of rotted out a lot of communities as well. It's hard to raise kids when you're on your own and there just aren't as many options for assistance. Wages have also been suppressed for quite some time so the money coming in just isn't meeting how much kids can cost.
So, is it feasible? Yeah, I see kids and families all the time. Is it more difficult in ways previous generations did not in general experience? Yeah, some of these struggles have been shared by many oppressed people historically but the widening of who struggles with raising children is new.
In the time of famines and wars in China, people (my grandparents and great grandparents) tend to have more kids. In less hard time, people stop having kids. There are a lot of factors at play, poor time requires people to not put all their chip in one place, a lot of family labour division needs a bigger household, there are a lot of community involvement (it requires a whole village to raise a child).
I love kids, I'm good with kids, always wanted them.
Decided not to have any. Climate change, capitalism, lack of nearby family for childcare, two working adults already have no time or energy without kids, and the fact America hates it's citizens and only cares if they can submit to a boss. I don't much like the world we live in and resent being born; I would have a lot of guilt bringing a child into the world
Idk comrade. I think for those of us who are back and forth about the subject who can conceive of an answer that would dissuade you from having children the biological directive isn't the motivation it used to be. There's plenty of people for whom there's no question and others still who have oopsie poopsies. If the future was theirs I wouldn't be too beat up about it. I struggle to find purpose, my temperament isn't often upbeat, and I struggle to find a partner to cherish. I don't like the political climate, the climate climate, or the economic climate on the horizon. A child feels like an obligation more than a desire to me and that immediately makes my internal referee throw a flag. That Islamic poet who talks about showing the world the love I had for your face would be what would make me have a child. I can't imagine any other reason. The child would be born to have a purpose - even born into a bleak world.
Give me a daughter with your stubborn heart, or your even temper.
Give our children your dark-bright eyes, or your enchanted smile.
So that even when we are gone, the world will find within them all of the reasons why I loved you
إعطني إبنة لها قلبك العنيد أو حتى طبعك
إعط طفلنا عيناك السمراوين اللامعين أو إبتسماتك المسحورة
لكي حتى و بعد رحيلنا، سيجد العالم فيهم كل الأسباب التي أحببتك لها
-Nizar Qabbani
Note that I don't know the first thing about Arabic, but that's what someone poster on Tumblr along with the poem. I'm 80% sure about the name of the poet.
Two costs that can make it unaffordable even for folks who are doing ok are daycare and health insurance. Those two expenses alone can be huge just for one child, much less two or more.
But, let’s say you have a grandparent who wants to watch your kid for free when you work and you have health insurance through work that covers your kids and isn’t too much $. Then honestly, kids aren’t THAT expensive and most working class folks could pull off having a kid or two.
The thing is, the entire child product industry is geared towards bougie parents because a lot of them will spend whatever and find ways to rationalize it. So when you go into the kids section of a store, it seems wildly expensive. But kids don’t eat much, second hand clothes and toys are dirt cheap (not like the kids care), and there are usually plenty of parents who want to just get rid of things like cribs and strollers.
Admittedly this is all geared towards younger kids, teens might be a lot more expensive idk.
It feels more and more like a bourgeois privilege to be able to have kids.
Which is obviously in conflict with the fact that it's an essential part of social reproduction, and has to happen at a large surplus for capitalism to sustain itself.
I don't think it's unethical or anything. Ethical codes kind of break down when you're talking about creating life I guess. Life perpetuating itself kinda just happens regardless of how bleak things get. And there's happiness to experience even in tumultuous times.
I can't imagine having kids though. I have a cat that is very important to me and he's already such a massive constraint on my ability to navigate the world as it is. Harder to find places to rent. Rent is more expensive. No longer feasible to live in my car. I have to put up with shit that I wouldn't otherwise have to because I know if I lose a job or have to move it'll be that much harder to get a home again. It feels like even having a pet is becoming a fucking bourgeois privilege. And that's just a cat. I don't even know how working class people manage having children nowadays. More expenses, have to manage schools and healthcare and everything, and you're responsible for an actual human who's gonna have to deal with their childhood experience for the rest of their life.
The absolute confused horror show that is my immediate family and their several children they had with the first person they met has made me want to be celibate for the rest of my life.
It's not like a fun story with nice conclusions or anything, but basically every parent and sibling I have had a shitty life, either abused or poor or in a loveless relationship with children, and was so desperate to get out of their life situation that they ran off and married pretty much the first person that would let them pack up and move in with them. For the most part this hasn't gone well for any of them though and they're far worse off than they were before, but now with several children each that they didn't consider whether they actually wanted or if they could afford to have with people they never considered if they actually loved, and eventually broke up with them (or are stayed with them in misery for the sake of the kids) leaving their kids with confused mix-matches of parents and stepparents, where stepkids don't get treated as well as the other ones and children that are technically my brothers and sisters having to call me uncle because who the fuck knows or cares to keep up with it any more. A dozen or more new lives that are just going to grow up without the financial or emotional support they need because their parents are still mentally children themselves and fuck knows society won't pity them. It'd be a god damn miracle if a single one of them makes something for themselves, they will have to fight an uphill battle at every corner just to grow up mentally, physically, and emotionally stunted and likely fall into the same problem of marrying the first person that gives them hope of getting out of their abject misery and wind up perpetuating the cycle with more children they can't afford and don't know how to raise.
My happiest uncle never had children. He rode on trains and hitchhiked to Alaska as a young man. Became an electrician and spent his free time hunting and fishing. Now he lives near the border in Arizona on small ranch with cows and horses.
If I had enough money to overcome capitalism I would adopt. That likely won't happen so I'll try to live as happily as possible on the limited resources available to me.