2w ago

"this program generates around 31GiB of FizzBuzz per second"

codegolf.stackexchange.com High throughput Fizz Buzz

Fizz Buzz is a common challenge given during interviews. The challenge goes something like this: Write a program that prints the numbers from 1 to n. If a number is divisible by 3, write Fizz inst...

I've spent months working on this program. I've long thought that "how fast can you make a FizzBuzz" would be a really interesting question for learning about high-performance programming, and when I subsequently saw this question posted on CGCC, I pretty much had to try.

This is so beautiful 🥹

edit: outjerked yet again https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/a/269772

TechSploits @reddthat.com

Red @reddthat.com

2y ago

High throughput Fizz Buzz

codegolf.stackexchange.com /questions/215216/high-throughput-fizz-buzz/236630

1 0

12 comments

Why did you post that implementation and not David Frank's with 1.7 Terrabit/s ?
- I saw it before that one, and by that time i already posted. I think deleting and reposting is a little weird so I guess I'll have to make due X)
  I'll mention it in the post body though, thanks lol
  
  Didn't realise that it's yours! Kudos :)
- Can we get a tldr for the approach used?
  
  hand-optimized SIMD-instructions probably

I already have a master's thesis. This was harder.
Lmao
- God I miss PCJ 😭

This isn’t even really C, it’s a bunch of assembly instructions jammed into C
Not that it’s not impressive… but still.
- Correction: This is not C. It may seem so because of the #include's and #define's but this is just standard gnu assembler syntax. You can notice that the included files are all in asm/ and the macros are just valid assembly.
  It's built with GCC instead of as because gcc links the standard library (which include those asm/ files) for you. Though you can build it normally with as, too.
  Heavy, iirc. I haven't done this stuff in a while so please correct me if i'm wrong.
  
  Oh dang ok. TIL
  I saw gcc and assumed c or c++ but it didn’t look like cop

12 comments