… let me be more clear. the suit is clogging a man-made object, stopping a public good from being delivered. nothing about this situation is natural. but it's obviously unjust. none of this has to do with capitalism, it has to do with power (authoritarian communist states can just as easily shut off your water as private companies).
Same point could be made around wealth then, by the same logic 🤔
Then there's also a discussion to be had around why we distinguish between man made and natural in order to imply a judgement based on a pretence, an agenda.
But if the point is that we could choose as humanity to end poverty, I'm totally in agreement with that part!
Humans don’t create prosperity. It was already here. Polluting the planet with artificial products and stealing resources intentionally for imagined prosperity is the act of humans and is not natural but a consequence of having free will and contemplative consciousness. Cutting off necessary resources for survival is cruel.
Humans absolutely created prosperity. The thing that was already here was nomadic hunter gatherer tribes that were perpetually one bad winter away from death.
Cutting off necessary resources is cruel. But refusing to acknowledge that those resources are provided by man made systems doesn't help you. Going to bed hungry is very natural. Wild animals do that all the time. Tap water is not natural, everything about how that water got from the river into your tap was man made.
Just because it's natural doesn't mean it's better, and just because it's man made doesn't mean it's bad.
Prosperity is an idea not a reality. You have prosperity because you created an idea called wealth. And with that idea comes another idea called poverty.
Were the cavemen prosperous? OFC. If they weren’t then we wouldn’t be here.
Humans didn’t create anything. They manipulate what’s already here. They make illusions seem real.