Skip Navigation

NonCredibleDefense @sh.itjust.works

Pat @sh.itjust.works

1mo ago

Gripen vs F-16

11 comments

Canards for the win!
BTW, it's not a straight competition, they fill different niches. If you have all your logistics sorted out and can maintain anything, buy an F-16 or an F-35, but be aware, they need that logistics to fight, so if you get bombed, you might lose that capability.
On the other hand, while the Gripen is less capable, your average country road, and some techs you send out with like two trucks can base it and keep it going. So Gripens might be more sensible if you want to defend assymmetrically against a larger power - like China, that's what they were originally made for anyway - against Russia.
- like China, that’s what they were originally made for anyway
  What, really? What's the story here? These are Swedish planes, right?
  
  I'm just illiterate, the Philippines vs China would look more like Sweden vs Russia than the US vs Russia.
  Hence, Swedish planes are a better fit.
  
  It's worded weird, I think they mean they were originally made to combat Russia

I demand more Swedish war machines

I wish Switzerland had chosen Gripen over the F35 :'(

Canada needs to reconsider our recent choice the other way. They even offered a whole Gripen production chain just in Canada.

Why not. No need to rely on conditional support from the US, especially with the unreliable new administration.

Gripen is the new nato standard!

11 comments