Of all the things to target, did they really have to go for the IA - the organisation that literally got into trouble with the man for helping children get access to books during the pandemic.
Does this hacker kick puppies and steal sweets from babies too?
According to the article some org called SN_blackmeta claimed and a Google search seems to suggest they are a pro Palestinian group based out of Russia with makes zero sense so Iโm gonna go with random Russian cunts are doing it, but you might be right as well with corpos mad about IA
Edit: the article -> https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/9/24266419/internet-archive-ddos-attack-pop-up-message
I genuinely don't know... there doesn't seem to be any ongoing discussion of who or why are these people targeting IA. There are other people who are trying to rescue data stored on IA
Yeah, I've see people speculating that it could be some corporate hit-job on behalf of book publishers, and I get it, that exotic possibility is attractive, but reality is usually much more mundane. It's likely to just be some randos doing it for the lulz and IA was vulnerable for whatever reason. Book publishers have sadly been enjoying plenty of success in court against IA. They don't need to get their hands dirty.
Digging deeper into the comments it seems someone found the message was from a compromised polyfill code that was running on IA. Now the website is down from a ddos. From what I can see there's no reason to believe their servers and the data therein have been compromised.
There's no "may" about it. The Ars Technica article indicates that the Internet Archive's front page was (briefly) altered in addition to the account data being stolen.
Why do we have to sign up to every fucking thing and it's brother? Everything gets hacked eventually. Why don't we just hand over our data to the hackers and cut out the middle man?