There’s a big difference between something being psychologically addictive, and something being chemically addictive.
Like, yea, you can technically get addicted to anything. But there’s a massive difference between getting addicted to, say, working out, and getting addicted to nicotine.
So food being chemically addictive is not something that’s been known for decades, in fact it’s been a common topic of debate.
I really identify with this article as I'm addicted to chips. When I stop I get awful withdrawal symptoms for two weeks, and it takes about two months for me to not feel the need any more. However eventually I fall back into it again because I underestimate it. I've often wished that there was some kind of external control for this stuff.
This sounds like keto flu. When people enter ketosis for the first time they have serious withdrawal symptoms, due to electrolyte imbalances. When you reduce your carbohydrate intake, your body is changing how it retains salt, which changes fluid levels. Which can lead to basically hangover. It's usually addressed with electrolytes.
There is an external control, if you do keto consistently, the cravings go away. Not the habits the cravings. Breaking the behavioral habits is a lifelong journey
I remember not eating that garbage for a whole year. I accidentally ended up in the chips section in the supermarket and I remember feeling so silly. I used to go through so much trouble to go to this place, think about the flavors and which one to buy, and waste money on it. At that point I couldn't possibly imagine doing something like that.
So electrolytes. Chips is also super salty, maybe that is related as well? Salt goes down, fluid goes down. So what do you recommend to get extra electrolytes?
The hormonal model of obesity fits into this paper very well. Basically the hormonal model says the addiction is not to food, it's to carbohydrates and sugar. Carbohydrates and sugar increase blood sugar levels, which increase insulin levels. Which puts the body into dysfunction. It doesn't matter how much food you're eating, it matters how much insulin your body is producing. Insulin is a massive superstar hormone that affects the entire body.
So a lot of the addiction and withdrawal people are talking about is sugar withdrawal, blood sugar dropping, and the body having to adapt to a new energy source. I. E. Fat burning / ketosis.
I think a lot of people making jokes about stuff like this may struggle to understand what addiction feels like from the inside and how intensity of desire is not always a function of withdrawal severity.
The popular image of addiction is something like a twitchy looking person begging for the next hit. This is rare, even for extremely addictive drugs with severe withdrawal.
Often addiction manifests internally as a fascination with something. When I smoked it was rare to not be on some level thinking about the logistics of when I would next light up. I also over emphasised the positive effects (many of which in hindsight were merely alleviating withdrawal which is hilarious) and diminished the negative ones.
As someone with a sweet tooth it's not so different to how I feel about treats. It's difficult not to think of grabbing one when shopping, I typically feel a desire after dinner, I often "cave" if something is around or eat it without much intention.
Contrast this with antidepressants, which can cause debilitating months long withdrawal. Yet when stopping SNRIs I had no powerful desires to consume them, despite knowing that doing so would make it stop feeling like my soul was being sucked out the back of my head.
There are reasons to be cautious about lots of research like this, pharma companies would love to sell a solution for example, but it's not outlandish. Nicotine is addictive because it makes your brain light up in certain ways, there is nothing special about the molecule except it does that thing (well and crosses the BBB). If there are other ways to make brains light up in similar ways without a specific chemical receptor it stands to reason that under certain circumstances addiction may manifest.
There's a line in the article that says food doesn't give a "high" like drugs do.
But I get literal highs off of food sometimes. Particularly beef, some fish, and other high protein meals like those. Typically, it will only happen when the meat is very well browned, a significant "crust" from the Maillard reaction, though it will occasionally happen when there's an acidic or slightly sweet side dish.
Salmon with sweet potato does it almost every time. Tuna steaks do it fairly reliably. Steaks will more often than other beef meals, but even burgers can do it.
Am I that fucking weird here?
It's a literal high. I get slightly dizzy, euphoric, giggly, and there's a distinct sense of well being and connection to the world. It isn't just being satisfied with a good meal, it's an change in mood, thinking and overall perceptions.
There is a bakery selling these cookies, I thought they're putting drugs in them. Cuz every time I ate them I felt euphoric, and my heart race of it. I was definitely getting a food high from those cookies
Well, you gotta consume it multiple times every day or your body stops functioning, and you get sick and die. If there's a better simpler more succinct description of an addiction I don't know what it is. Same goes for oxygen, water, and sleep, those motherfuckers.