I'm into cars. They all have personalities and behaviours. I often see cars and think, "When it rolled out of the factory on its first day, did it ever imagine that one day it would be like this?"
"What am I going to be when I grow up?"
"You're going to ferry an old business man off his estate twice a month, then be sold to an Uber Black driver that won't look after you so you'll blow blue smoke and eventually be sold to a scrap yard for parts."
"Oh... 😔"
"And what about me? What will I be?"
"You're going to have three 122mm rocket launchers strapped to you and you'll help liberate a nation."
"You'll be bought by a texan plumber to use as a business vehicle, only to be later sold and somehow end up in the middle east helping isis with Mark's Plumbing still written on the side and a heavy machine gun mounted to the rear"
I have to disagree with you man. I've transported so many bodies in the back of a BMW coupe and i can't begin to stress how wrong you are. Any serial killers considering a mercedes just stop. A BMW coupe can fit 2 unalived persons with absolute ease.
A golf cart with an expended LAW tube, welded to the back, and used to launch as many motars as it can before one blows inside and kills it's operator, is a technical.
Any motorized civilian vehicle augmented to kill shit in war is a technical. Except maybe VBIED's, that I'm not sure about.
Which means that's the question you should be asking: was a technical used in Oklahoma City bombing?
The only place the OK City bombing was considered a war was inside Timothy McVeigh's diseased mind, so I would contest that his rental van was not a technical, but mostly on a technicality.