108cm is squarely within the range of dwarfism so, as a minority, I wouldn't be surprised if the data the user is searching for is scarce or missing altogether.
Hence the result pictured.
That said, the person searching this could have just made a typo for 180cm, which is much more common.
Why am I analysing the meme? Who knows.
36 0 ReplyWell overthinking things is generally quite fun, at least until it's not.
4 0 Reply
Your weight is positive? Aren't you ashamed to go out of the house with such a body
13 0 ReplyThe fatso didn't leave the house, but ate it from whithin.
2 0 Reply
Checks out.
8 0 ReplyPff, you youngsters and your high tech.
2 0 Reply
Damn, better watch your diet extra carefully on holidays too, that's a very tight window.
7 0 ReplyThis week on Extreme weight loss
6 0 ReplyHave you tried, you know, just not existing?
4 0 ReplyNot terribly surprising that the algorithm fails for dwarfs.
4 0 ReplyAll my life i thought i was underweight
This post says i am in the healthy weight range(ignore the height) and people cant lie on the internet
4 0 ReplyThe latter is just an unsigned int that got a little too excited
3 0 ReplyFor comparison, Peter Dinklage is 135cm, Joe C (hype man for Kid Rock) was 114cm, and Verne Troyer was 81cm.
3 0 ReplySomehow I'm not surprised the tallest one is the must successful
1 0 Reply
The first zero is missing the units.
3 0 Reply