Ukraine was biding its time: while outside analysts downplayed their chances, the Ukrainians were quietly planning an offensive across the Russian border
While outside analysts downplayed their chances, the Ukrainians were quietly planning an offensive across the Russian border.
Earlier this week, reports began filtering in that Ukrainian forces had entered Russia’s Kursk province, in what many analysts assumed was a small cross-border raid—of a sort that Ukraine has attempted a few times since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022. But as the hours and days ticked by and Ukrainian forces moved deeper and deeper into Russian territory, [...] and had soon seized more ground from Russia in a few days than Russia has taken during an offensive in the Kharkiv region that began in the spring. As part of the new incursion, Ukraine has been deploying advanced armored vehicles, including German-supplied Marder infantry fighting vehicles—a striking development, given the unease among Kyiv’s allies about being seen as escalating hostilities between the West and Russia.
The initial success of what’s looking more and more like a full offensive shows what the Ukrainians can achieve if they have both the tools and the latitude to fight Russia. Ukraine’s most generous benefactors, especially the United States and Germany, have previously expressed their strong opposition to the use of their arms on Russian soil. [...]
Now Washington and Berlin may be softening their positions more than they’re explicitly saying. A Pentagon spokesperson said Thursday that U.S. officials still “don’t support long-range attacks into Russia” but also that the Kursk incursion is “consistent with our policy.” Perhaps President Joe Biden, freed of electoral considerations, can focus more on how best to help the Ukrainians now—and limit the damage that Donald Trump could do to their cause if he wins in November. The White House’s notably bland statement on the Ukrainian offensive on Wednesday was hardly the sign of an administration in panic.
[...]
Throughout this war, widespread electronic surveillance by both sides has frequently tipped each off about the other’s plans. But in recent weeks, Kyiv built up the necessary forces so stealthily that the Russians had no idea what was going to hit them. The Ukrainians apparently carefully arranged for drones and computer hackers to suppress Russian resistance once their soldiers crossed the border. In three days, they came close to seizing the Russian city of Sudzha, through which runs a key rail line close to the Ukrainian border.
[...]
Notably, the U.S. and German governments have not publicly opposed any of this. Perhaps the two allies are no longer as nervous about cross-border operations as they were. Maybe the U.S. has finally come to understand that if Ukraine really is going to have a chance to win, it must be allowed to fight the war properly.
The real answer, of course, is that no one outside the Ukrainian government really knows what is happening—and, so far, Kyiv has been extremely tight-lipped on this operation. Having kept it quiet before it started, the last thing the Ukrainians want to do is let Russia know their intention. Whatever happens, the Kursk offensive has been a well-executed operation to this point. It’s their plan. Let them see to it.
Analysts can only work on existing data. A key to winning a war, is to keep your data secret, whether it be number of units, positioning, strategies, etc.
Maybe, just maybe, the real analysts and strategists, don't go blabbering all they know to the media.
I think we should be cautious. In the first days of Russias offensive four years ago they made huge gains quickly. The Russians will move assets and warplanes to the area and Ukraine will be stretched thin in more fronts.
I’m not pro-Russia by any stretch. I love to see Ukraine getting wins. I am just worried that they would have been better off being this aggressive on their existing fronts
An analysis I watched suggests that by occupying Russian territory, they force Russia to either let them dig in long term or stay on the offensive to try to push them out just when Russia would be slowing their summer offensive. Ukraine is fighting a defensive war of attrition and their strategy is to force Russia to keep attacking while Ukraine has a defensive advantage.
Now, this shit is way above my pay grade, but that analysis explains why this could be a smart move. So it sounds like there is reason to be cautiously optimistic.
Don't see why there should be any political opposition from the West for Ukraine going deep into Russia. Russia is the agressor invading them, after all. Anything between Kursk and Vladivostok is fair game.
Propaganda has lead a depressing number of people to believe exactly the opposite. MTG literally said, "what, you think Putin just decided to invade Ukraine?"
As already demonstrated US allowed Ukraine to use HIMARS on targets near Kharkiv and that that did not leave to nuclear war. Why not also let Ukraine use ATACMS?
Russia's nuclear sabre rattling isn't credible because their nuclear arsenal is not dispersed. Dispersal is the key to a nuclear exchange and it's why both sides spend so many billions on submarines and stratobombers. Since the cold war Russia's nuclear assets have been sitting grouped at bases around the country. If Putin wants to be credible he has to first order the planes in the air and the submarines to sea. But the submarine he sent to Cuba was accompanied by a tug "just in case."
This is a demo, as well as a distraction - IMHO. Hopefully the latter would negate the need for the former, but only an election cycle will tell.. and I hope Harris makes the right move, because we all know what Trump would do... heck, put a golden Trump Tower into the Ukranian military budget, watch him switch sides.
But at the end of the day, Ukraine wants to prove that they can pull Russian forces out of Ukraine, rather than push. If they are somewhat successful, an escalation could lead to the depletion of Russian army assets in Ukraine, because all Russian army assets are in Ukraine, which has been proven by this invasion.
Basically Russia either has to A) continue fighting in Ukraine and cartoonishly lose more land in Russia, or B) reroute troops and assets to Russia to push back the invaders.