It's annoying that they referenced several times the quote appeared since the early 1900s, but didn't take a single step to determine if such a thing was written down in a museum in Istanbul.
I have not shown whether or not this is a quote from an ancient work.
I've shown that the quote, and its provenance has survived largely intact since the 1920s at least.
In particular, it has been traced far further back than Sir Isaac Asimov's book (as suggested by others here).
However, I have shown it was not both Assyrian and from 2800 BC. It may have in Akkadian, a related language, from 2800 BC, but that is earlier than any references I found so I find it unlikely. It might have been Sumerian.
IMHO, given the dubious provenance of the source, a more likely scenario is that it is either a true quote, oddly translated, from a much later date, or invented in the early 20th Century.
There's no doubt whatsoever that people thousands of years ago expressed these things, but yeah, it's too bad we don't have an actual surviving example.
The goddamn frustrating thing is that it only happened because it's normal and accepted in Europe. It's only because of the bs puritanical culture war in the US that they think it's somehow relevant to them. Haven't even stopped to think that there are other cultures at the... Olympics
Especially when one of the loudest religions actively want to doom the world so that their sky daddy can show everyone else how right they were this whole time...
Or bodies are in a constant state of getting older and undergoing collapse. I think that believing in the good old days is a reaction to getting old. I think that believing in some golden past is it reaction to our own bodily degeneration. Fear of our mortality is a powerful force, and I think that a large amount of people externalize/project that fear onto their perception of society.
The end of the world hasn't happened for everyone yet, but the world does end for some individuals every day.
Reminds me of the poem the florist has in Grim Fandango that goes something like: it may be years, it may be hours, but sooner or later everyone pushes up flowers.
I think it's more that you get taught the "right" way of doing, speaking, etc. and people are geared to dislike challenges to that idea until they learn to accept change. Another example would be people who've learnt how to do a particular task at work being shown a better way of doing it but having a niggling sense that the way they'd learnt first is ipso facto better.
I'm currently reading "All the Knowledge in the World: A History of the Encyclopedia" by Simon Garfield. It mentions a similar thought held by some around the time of the creation of the Encyclopedia Brittanica. (Late 1700s, if I recall correctly)
There were too many books, and they were being printed by just anyone. Who needs a really long dictionary, anyway?
I understand the point. But it misses an extremely important factor: technology.
Yes, humans have played pretend we were this world's owners/masters since civilization began.
But our toolbox is filled with tech that can literally reverse terraform the climate against us, and we're using it with abandon and without restraint. Add to that AI, CRISPR derived bioweapons, etc. We've gotten to the point where we cobble together yet another means of world wide destruction every decade or two, and we all know we're too stupid and selfish not to for the prospect of short term, individual gain.
They were monkeys with spears and swords, a threat to rival monkey tribes, but in no way the entire species. We are monkeys with nukes and beyond.
"It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity"
No Italian rebel crisis, no more Cato, no more independent Pompeii, Julias Ceaser got married, this Cicero guy really knows how to argue. So much better than the 70s.
meaningless. what does it mean for a society to be complex? what does "collapse" entail? if a certain amount complexity makes a society collapse, why are we more complex than ever? shouldn't society have collapsed before this point?
just a bunch of nonsensical words strung together to mean nothing more than "i don't understand some things and it makes me afraid". literally the mindset of people who think trans people existing will lead to the downfall of society.
You should probably know that historically societies collapsing has typically resulted in improved health of the lower classes as judged by skeletons in the archeological record.
We should not really understand societies collapsing as a violent or spectacular thing. It's usually just growth slowing, people move away, the ability of states to enforce taxes and provide services weakens and people work out their own stuff.
I'm not saying society is collapsing, just that if it does it'll probably look more like declining birthrates and movement away from cities and advanced manufacturing to more agrarian lifestyle. Also that for the poor and downtrodden this will probably, on average, be an improvement.