No consideration of the possibility of her changing her views eh
Before or after she was part of an administration that continued Trump's border wall policies?
Either.
Changing your mind is something human.
What so you think is more probable for a successful politician that has shown to be susceptible to corruption, a change of mind or simple opportunism?
I would be willing to accept the possibility of her views changing if there was any evidence her views have changed. I haven't seen any evidence though, and so I think the safest assumption is that she's still the same woman that kept people in prison past the end of their sentence and denied healthcare to trans people in prison.
She was for it, then against it, then was part of an administration that continued Trump's border wall policies.
Oi, Ranger, while in the spirit of the community is this not technically electioneering? You might want to expand on what you mean in the sidebar.
Saying the emperor has no clothes isn't electioneering.
I've often said that the only hope I see for any sort of meaningful anarchism is that that's what our descendents might build out of the rubble we leave behind.
I never thought it would be put to the test quite so soon though.
No consideration of the possibility of her changing her views eh
Before or after she was part of an administration that continued Trump's border wall policies?
Either.
Changing your mind is something human.
What so you think is more probable for a successful politician that has shown to be susceptible to corruption, a change of mind or simple opportunism?
I would be willing to accept the possibility of her views changing if there was any evidence her views have changed. I haven't seen any evidence though, and so I think the safest assumption is that she's still the same woman that kept people in prison past the end of their sentence and denied healthcare to trans people in prison.