Donald Trump has asked a federal judge to freeze the classified documents case against him in light of a Supreme Court ruling this week that said former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution.
Full circle. Makes you wonder what the Declaration of Independence was for. And to Constitution... And like, a huge chunk of American history up til now. They should just go back under Charles. Say what you want about the royals, they do their job as well as a royal is meant to. Monarchies over large populations have their issues, but if this is where they want to head back to...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that might cover taking the documents, but retaining them... he was no longer president and therefore incapable of taking 'official' acts?
Look, Judge Cannon says you raise some good points too. We'll need some time for written briefs from each side. Due three months from now. Then we'll need time for written responses, at least another month. We'll schedule a few days of hearings to really hash through those details. And then she promises to think about it real hard, imply she'll dismiss the case immediately once the trial begins, but make no actual official ruling yet, that would be premature. Then we have this backlog of other issues to work through of course. What, you suggest we address these issues in parellel? How dare you speak to a judge in this way, you are being inappropriate!! These issues that have been ruled on many times in the past by other courts as a routine matter are totally novel and demand years of study before a trial can begin!
Etc etc etc
If he doesn't win the election and just fire half the justice department next January, she may just push the trial date so far Trump dies of natural causes before it even happens.
For the record, I imagine he could die any day now. His exercise regimen is driving around in a golf cart pretending to play golf, yelling at staff and scarfing McDonald’s hamberders.
Donald Trump has asked a federal judge to freeze the classified documents case against him in light of a Supreme Court ruling this week that said former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution.
I love that it says former presidents, not presidents in general. I also remember the ruling saying that it was immunity for things that fall within the Presidents "official duties", of which Roberts gave Trump's team two examples (pardons and AG/DOJ). I wouldn't call that "broad immunity". This very well could be something that Roberts and his co-conspirators had in mind for the "presumptive immunity" type of act though, and the fun part is they didn't define it so they get to rule if it does/doesn't, super!