Remote View
A cool guide to Epicurean Paradox
A cool guide to Epicurean Paradox
158 comments
-
Is there actually "free will" without evil?
-
why not? you can choose to eat a banana or an apple, both perfectly non evil
-
I will die on a hill that says a banana is more good than an apple.
Making the apple relatively more evil on the scale from good to evil.
Others may prefer an apple. But I guess that is their free will to choose so 😉
-
I mean there was that whole 'garden of eden' thing with the apples...
-
Wasn't the forbidden fruit in the garden of eden originally a fig or date or olive or something? It was changed to apple in the later translations. Something like that .
-
I thought it was a pomegranate
-
-
-
I'm allergic to bananas. But I'm pretty wicked so this tracks.
-
-
The free will is more about choosing to follow god or not. So if everything god does is good and everything they want you to do is good, you have no choice but to do those things. So you live in a perfect world but are a puppet.
-
-
An all-powerful god wouldn't be affected by such logic. They could have changed the rules to allow for free will without evil.
-
-
You have proof there is no God?
-
-
By your logic, I could say there is no gravity, just an infinite number of invisible angles pushing things down.
-
-
You asserted that there was no God.
You're unable to prove your claim.
Now you're resorting to an ad hominem attack.
You have a right to say you don't believe in God, but no way to prove it.
And here's a list of ad hominem attacks, so you can improve your logic.
-
Six hours later: resorts to ad hominem attacks when he can't defend his argument. The hypocrisy is off the scales!
-
Are you following all my posts now?
Maybe you should go outside and touch the grass instead.
-
-
-
A lot of capital letters and some dirty words. I'll let your own reply speak for itself.
Good day.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
158 comments