You're viewing a single thread.
40
comments
Let's crunch the numbers, would it be financially sensible to pay for m to f transition of Employees, so you can pay them less in the long run?
Now this is businessing!
Mandatory MTF transition as a job requirement on the horizon.
Maga hats say this unironically. It's a Republican scare tactic.
With 27% pay cut and the employee having a 3000/month salary and them working a decade in most cases yes
„So John… Listen. We‘re not enough revenue to pay you your regular salary. Either you cut off your d*ck, or we‘ll have to cut you off“
I like that cutting his Pay as man is no option whatsoever
Now you're getting it!
You've viewed 40 comments.