You're viewing a single thread.
View all comments
9
comments
I need to scream over and over. The Cass Review is not peer reviewed. Scientifically, it's a blog paid for by NHS.
46 0 ReplyIt’s had several peer reviewed rebuttals that are damning, however.
17 0 ReplyAny chance you have some links handy? I just had an argument with my brother about this issue but didn't have any sources.
8 0 Replythis critique points out the numerous methodological flaws in the report.
7 0 Reply4 0 ReplyThank you very much!
2 0 Reply
Permanently Deleted
3 0 ReplyFeck my effort comment didn't post.
Tldr: meta analysis get peer reviewed like any sort of study.
3 0 Reply
You've viewed 9 comments.
Scroll to top