You're viewing a single thread.
What type of middle school logic is this? If a bad thing happens to kids then its okay for other bad things to happen... amazing logic!
How is drag queens existing a "bad thing to happen" to kids?
Talking to kids about intentionally sexual things is a bad thing. Why do you think its good for non family members to talk to children about sexual things?
Intentionally sexual? Where on Earth did you get that from?
Unintentionally sexual things are okay. Hence why they still serve bananas and eggplants in school cafeterias.
My eyes...
Then it's possible the sexual bit is with you.
"Dont believe your lying eyes"
No, they're saying that you're the one with perverted sexual ideas.
Didn't someone say you ought to pluck your eyes out if they cause you to sin? Accusing innocent people of horrible crimes absolutely is a sin.
Did you know that drag is not always sexual? It can be, but it doesn't have to be.
Then how about we compromise and just not do them because they typically are?
Well, they sure as hell aren't when they're reading to kids at the library, so how about we "compromise" by not letting children into the 18+ venues when they are sexual?
Reading to kids and not conforming to conservatism's prescribed roles is what scares reactionaries.
They very much want to stop them both.
They are still sexualized representations of women when they are reading to kids... Just because its not absurdly sexual doesnt mean its not sexual. Why is it so important to you guys that kids see sexual things? Why not play it safe and just not show them things that are not remotely sexual?
I have honestly never seen drag queens in a sexual context. To me they just seem like people (not even specifically like women, and definitely not sexualised versions of them) who had a little too much fun with makeup. I don't find it appealing either, but I don't care because they're free to do as they please and it doesn't bother me in any way. If you see anything sexual in their appearance, that's your problem. Some might see something sexual in spaghetti/tank tops or bikinis, but who cares, especially children usually don't even think of that.
Because if you had it your way, we would never teach them anything about sex, ever. And that's how you groom kids up to be molested by the clergy and close relatives.
"Children will never get burned if we make it illegal to teach them about fire!" -cablemonster and friends.
How about you stop whining about imaginary specks in your neighbor's eye when you have a plank to remove from your own? Pedophiles are everywhere in churches, because people like you do everything to keep their favorite hunting grounds safe and easy.
All this hysteria about trans women only began after churches got caught providing aid and comfort to tens of thousands of active pedophiles among the clergy. Been a while since that was in the news, hasn't it? Sure wasn't because y'all cleaned house though, was it? Nope. It's because y'all started screeching about persecution, pointing fingers, and blaming social outcasts for your crimes.
The LGBTQ community has zero tolerance for child molesters. The church only has zero tolerance for us, but y'all keep your pedos around, safe and sound, and your kids ignorant of the danger and ripe for the plucking.
I've told you this before, and will continue to do so, whenever I see it. But you never respond. I wonder why that is? Oh yeah, it's because you know it's true and you've got nothing.
Remove the plank from your own eye, you hypocrite.
How are YOU going to explain to your kids that they're more likely to be molested in church and at home than anywhere else? Pedophiles flock to churches because believers never question so-called men of God. Even when they do get busted, you idiots always forgive them and blame the victim instead. The entire reason y'all are freaking out and accusing innocent LGBTQ people of child grooming is because everyone knows that YOU hysterical shit-stirrers give pedophiles free reign to do exactly that in church. You want to take attention off that fact. That's what grooming is.
Drag usually isn't sexual. For example, Shakespeare's plays were at the time performed by an all male cast, because women weren't allowed to be actors. So Juliet, in the original plays, was a man in drag. So was Lady Macbeth. And the witches. And Cleopatra.
That wasn't because the plays were supposed to be sexual. It was because people back then were misogynists.
And it's weirdly only the US that seems to get all weird and upset about Drag. The UK took Shakespeare another step forward with the Panto (men play women, women play men), and they love it.
You again huh?