Skip Navigation

Bulletins and News Discussion from June 3rd to June 9th, 2024 - Morena Reigns More - COTW: Mexico

Image is of protestors in Mexico City battling police and the barriers they erected, after protestors threw Molotovs at the Israeli embassy.

Much of the preamble has been sourced from Michael Roberts' recent analysis of Mexico.


Claudia Sheinbaum, part of the left-wing and populist Morena party to which AMLO also belongs, is now the first woman to ascend to the Mexican presidency. She is also a climate/energy scientist and was previously mayor of Mexico City. Results indicate that she has won with approximately 60% of the vote, which would be the highest vote percentage in Mexican history.

AMLO's presidency has been generally successful. He campaigned on reducing violence inside Mexico, and while this has technically occurred if measured from 2018, homicides are still considerably higher than in 2010. This is largely due to warring drug cartels, which are more reflective of the United States and its rise in drug addiction and thus imports from Mexico. He also campaigned on reducing corruption, which he also kinda has, and also on reducing income inequality, which he also kinda has. The overall figures don't show massive budges in income inequality, but the minimum wage has risen by 82% and manufacturing wage have risen 27%, and this plus other social programs has lifted 9 million Mexicans out of extreme poverty - a good achievement - but not much further than that, with poverty rates still above the Latin American average. Unemployment is officially at record lows, but much of this job growth has been in the informal sector.

The Mexican economy suffered greatly during the pandemic, and while growth since then has been pretty decent, the economy is still below where it was in 2018. As Mexican capitalists do not pay much in taxes, AMLO's programs have required large budget deficits and borrowing. These capitalists are, of course, not doing many productive investments and thus there is not much productivity growth; productivity has been more-or-less stagnant for two decades. The reason why Mexican capitalists are not investing is because of the major decline in profitability since the 1990s - there is no reason to invest if your money is at major risk of not making a profit. Therefore, they have followed the trend of other national capitalists of investing in real estate and speculation, particularly in American companies.

Since NAFTA/USMCA, Mexico has become increasingly dependent on the United States for a location for its exports, while the US has exploited cheap labour in Mexico. Additionally, with the anti-Chinese sanctions increasingly put in place by the US, Mexico has become one of several conduits for China to redirect its goods so that they can still reach American markets. This has allowed Mexico to have an essentially balanced trade account and keep the peso relatively strong against the dollar.

Mexico's limited fortunes will likely decline from here as the US economy continues to slow. If Trump is elected, he may decree protectionist policies which will hit a US-reliant Mexico quite hard. Additionally, industrial production has recently declined and retail spending is also down. AMLO's presidency was genuinely beneficial for the poorest 50%, but the policies he created failed to really change the fundamentals of the economy. He relied on the private sector rather than the public sector. This is not entirely his fault - if he had tried to do anything terribly transformative, Mexico would have probably been hit hard with consequences by the US and simultaneously faced a domestic revolt by Mexican capitalists. There were and are already threats of outright invasion in response to the limited things AMLO has already done.

In an increasingly multipolar future in which America becomes weaker and weaker, it's very possible that Mexico's reliance on the US will decrease, allowing parties to be more radical without facing the possibility of facing crippling sanctions like Venezuela. However, Mexico's sheer proximity to the US means that they might be among the last countries to break free of American influence, as the US will continue to bitterly resist any attempt to break down the Monroe Doctrine long after it loses Asia, Europe, and Africa. So, it seems likely that Sheinbaum may soon find herself in a situation where she is forced by capitalists to implement fiscal austerity regardless of her intentions, which is equivalent to a declaration of war on the working class. What happens then is anybody's guess.


The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.

The Country of the Week is Mexico! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.

Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week's thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


1.3K

You're viewing a single thread.

1.3K comments
  • An exit poll suggests an interesting result of the Danish EU elections. For the first time in more than a century, neither the Succdem party or the Liberal Party are the largest party in a national election. With 18,4 percent of the vote SF, the "Socialist People's Party" (a squishier, greener form of succdems) has become the most popular choice.

    In 2022 the succdems chose to abandon their traditional strategy of forming minority governments with parliamentary support of the centre-left and opted to form a majority government with two other right-wing parties, namely the Liberal Party and an astroturfed centrist vehicle for the continuation of the political career of former liberal prime minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen.

    That exited a lot of people who have opinions for a living, finally we could have sensible policy for the majority of people, free from the corrupting extremism of "the wings". Reality turned out to be a lot less rosy, free from the civilising constraints of a threat from the left, the new extreme centre government embarked on a programme of deeply unpopular decisions, including the abolition of a popular public holiday, cuts on education and shitcanning a promised investigation into prime minister Mette Frederiksen's liability for the illegal culling of minks during covid.

    In addition their messaging was one of doom, gloom and finger-wagging, seeking to raise what they called "crisis awareness". The world is a scary place, we were told, with Russia and China lurking to hurt us. We were told that an imminent need for aggressive military buildup meant that there were no money for welfare or healthcare or elder care or anything else. There were however some money to pay for the tax cus the liberals demanded as their prize for entering the coalition. In addition to that, top succdem officials, including party leader Mette Frederiksen herself, felt an inexplicaple urge to scold the public fire bott working hard enough, calling us lazy and entitled and contrasting it with Russia where "the factories run around the clock" and "people [working in the factories] don't go home".

    During all of this the succdems also managed to severely sour relations to the trade unions who have been their top supporters for as long as they have existed. Especially abolishing the holiday without consulting with unions and employers as it is otherwise the norm to do when legislating on labour law pissed off the unions to such a degree that succdem speakers who have otherwise headlined Mayday rallies were banned form them entirely last year.

    In contrast to this you have the Socialist People's Party. Being founded as an early Eurocommunist party in 1957 by former communist leader Aksel Larsen (who defected to the CIA as part of the process). Since then they lived a relatively unnoticed existence as representatives of the soft western left, supporting every revolution except the ones that succeeded. In the 1980's they were among the first to pick up the green and environmentalist agenda. From the turn of the millennium SF began "professionalising" and moved to the right, with the goal of becoming "fit for government".

    Their dreams materialised in 2011 when they became they formed a government with the succdems and the centre-right "Radical Left" party under the leadership of succdem leader Helle Thorning-Schmidt, the spouse of British Labour ghoul Stephen Kinnock.

    It turned out the SF was everything but fit for government. Parliamentary realities meant that the "Radical Left" party called the shots and were able to steamroll over the SF, blocking all of their promises from being realised. Eventually internal tensions led to SF leaving the government and splitting.

    Since then the SF has recovered and has managed to find a position of projecting a green and progressive image without doing it so much that they're perceived as being "angry" or "looney" or "extreme" and they have severely dialled down their antiracism, thereby being more palatable to resist voters.

    In recent years the succdems' have accelerated their constant movement to the right, becoming more aggressively socially regressive. This has opened a niche for the SF who are now able to appeal to disaffected succdem voters by being succdems without so much nasty stuff.

    EU elections are different from general elections but there's no way tonight's results are not raising serious concerns in the succdem party apparatus.

    • Parliamentary realities meant that the "Radical Left" party called the shots

      Before people get excited: "Radical Left" is the name of a centre-right party in danish politics. They are named thusly because they are an off-shoot of the major right-wing party, which is of course called "Left".
      Danish politics is fun because all the names suck. You have the "Liberal Alliance" that are against women's rights, the "Danish Peoples' Party" that are against policies that make more danish people (they're racists), the "Unity List" which was created as a coalition between several left-wing parties (even a few trots), a few parties has since split from the party and created new left wing parties like "The Communist Party" "The Communists" and "Revolutionairy Socialists", all of whom mainly sit around and wait for the revolution to arrive. Then there's the "Alternative" which offers themselves as an alternative to voting for a party that takes itself seriously, and the "Moderates" that are centrists according to their leader (who used to be the leader of Left) and the danish media (they base this claim on the fact that the Moderates say that they are moderates).

      • Moderates are the people who are happy to flip-flop between the two big parties of the "extreme centre" blob. It doesn't matter that the two big ones are rabid neoliberal ghouls, if you're between them you're considered a reasonable moderate.

        • But the Moderates aren't moderate though, not even for regular politics. They're very clearly conservatives like Lars Løkke. The media just regurgitating "They're moderate! Lars has said his party is moderate!" and the people buying it no questions made me so angry. That whole election "ooooh there's the moderate party and they're not in any block because they're moderate, super duper moderate, so moderate we can't place them in a block, who know what block they'll end up in?" made me feel like I was going insane.

      • Good post. both informative and humours.

You've viewed 1344 comments.