It's a stupid comment practice where they claim ownership of their comment and place what they think is a binding and effective license against AI using that comment.
It literally does nothing. This is the modern equivalent of making a post on Facebook to assert that you have rights and control of your comments there.
Beyond the tools for editing and deletion you have no such rights in the Fediverse and it's a good way to demonstrate you don't understand how anything works.
Nothing stops anyone or any entity from indexing, ingesting, or scraping federated content.
It's true though honey. By using a service, you consent to that service's eula. It's legally childlike to accept an agreement, use a service, and then once inside that service, say "I've changed my mind. I'm going to continue to use the service but I don't want to follow the rules anymore so I just won't"
Y'know, it's funny. I was looking over my comment history just a second ago, and before I got your message the previous comment was sitting at 2 and now it's at 0. Right after you messaged me. When your arguments are dogshit in a community that's not particularly fond of China. It's almost like you're using multiple accounts to manipulate votes like a loser tankie.
You saying I have multiple accounts and I care enough to manipulate a deep level comment upvote count?
Anyway, ultra-capitalism is when the government is even LESS involved. So you are saying in China the government has virtually no involvement in the market? Oookeydokey.