Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
CPUSA, through its party's media apparatus People's World, continues to take the ultra-left position of condemning all opposition to American hegemony as it first did against Russia by condemning Iran's anti-imperialist work against Israel through platforming the Tudeh Party of Iran's article.
The world has well and truly entered a dangerous epoch, with humanity currently facing a series of interconnected existential threats. A sharply deteriorating situation around the world of poverty, exploitation, and social injustice; “forever” conflicts that could very easily escalate into nuclear war; a looming climate catastrophe by 2030; as well as the exponential increase in ultra-nationalism and ethno-sectarianism and the entailing rise once more of fascism—all of them together represent a mere snapshot of the multi-dimensional crisis which humanity now faces.
The sheer level of brutality waged against the defenseless, and indeed blameless and innocent, Palestinian civilians by Israel’s war machine, along with the propensity of various governments and institutions in the U.S., Britain, and the E.U., hand in glove with the narrative put out by mainstream media outlets in the West that has shamelessly attempted to justify or normalize Israel’s genocidal campaign, is the foremost example of the terrible threat posed to the future of humanity and the international rules and rights-based consensus that followed the end of the Second World War.
We bear witness, with alarm, to so-called liberal democratic governments and “free” media agencies consciously aligning themselves with ultra-right forces in Israel’s ruling circles that openly profess apartheid, even fascistic, politics.
The aforementioned threats are almost all rooted in the ever-deepening crisis of capitalism, compounded by four decades of imposed neoliberalism and its resounding failure, and the desperate attempts by U.S. imperialism to uphold its weakening hegemony, regardless of what this might portend for humanity.
So far sounds nice, but here's where the break in opinions begin to occur.
Thus, it is now vital for the left and a wide spectrum of progressive forces domestically and internationally to form alliances that effectively mobilize to counter the threat posed by U.S. imperialism and its allies. Such alliances depend on the setting of clear and achievable progressive objectives based on class-conscious politics at local, national, and international levels.
Here's a fundamental question for anyone here, what material power does the "left and a wide spectrum of progressive forces domestically and internationally" have? Let me underline this absurdity with the apocryphal tale on Stalin and Christianity: When he was asked to ease the persecution of Christians in the Soviet Union in order to strengthen diplomatic ties and possibly strategically flip Pope Pius XII indifferent opinion towards nazi Germany, Stalin jovially said "hah! The Pope? How many divisions does he got?"
When examining today's world we must examine all parts of it in concrete terms and not on ethereal fantasies. What anti-imperialist alliance that exist today can make a material impact on the material world that doesn't just devolve into just yapping on zoom meetings about how bad something is.
Such a vital alliance cannot simply be comprised of an arbitrary and ad hoc collective of regimes, political forces, and paramilitary organizations united solely by their opportunistic—and often shallow—adversarialism to Washington. A glaring example of this flawed equation in process is the confusing of the forces of “political Islam” in the Middle East, which rail from a frighteningly reactionary perspective against Western culture and modernity, as principled anti-imperialist allies.
Here we see the common argument of the current ultra-left faction of the contemporary international marxist-leninist movement. An argument that has been fossilized since the end of the Second internationale during the first world war.
It is an argument couched on world-changing strength of the international labor movement of the time that had the power to topple empires.
Our concrete conditions today do not even reflect a shadow of that period.
You do not take as the starting point of your policy a series of theatrical gestures towards ethereal parties and beings who are revolutionary from head to foot instead of concrete human beings and the nations they reside in.
And foremost among these forces of “political Islam” falsely considered as anti-imperialist by some in left and progressive circles is the Islamic Republic regime in Iran. The reaching of this deeply flawed conclusion involves the convenient ignoring or pushing aside of that regime’s despotic material nature and horrific track record, while fundamentally misunderstanding or misrepresenting its destabilizing, malevolent, and sectarian posturing regionally and internationally.
How many missiles have you launched at the IDF in support of the PLFP?
It is important to note that Iran’s foreign policies in the Middle East region, and consequently its extraterritorial military proxy activities, are predicated on Shia sectarianism and Ayatollah Khomeini’s exhortation to “export the Islamic Revolution.” Aside from running wholly contrary to Iran’s national interests as well as wantonly endangering the Iranian people, this policy bent has proved deeply divisive and unpopular throughout the region and has always manifested to the major detriment of secular, particularly left and progressive, forces.
I shan't comment on Islamic religious or Iranian state policies as I have no academic knowledge on the field.
At every critical juncture in the region’s history over the past 40 years, the Islamic Republic has actively collaborated with U.S. imperialism—including in Afghanistan and Iraq. The theocratic regime’s empty posturing and crocodile tears shed for the plight of the Palestinians are exposed as just that when one considers how Iran has consistently worked to undermine the struggle of secular, left, and progressive Palestinian forces against Israel’s occupation.
Is countering u.s engineered virulant Wahhabism after its rampaged out of CIA control in conjunction with u.s, Iraqi, Syrian, kurdish, Russian forces, etc. really the condemnation they think it is?
Put simply, a truly anti-imperialist alliance cannot be crafted on the defunct logic that goes along the lines of “the enemy of my enemy is therefore my friend!”
The person writing this would rather have a pure anti-imperialist alliance that entirely exists on paper.
From a left perspective, rooted in the works of Marx and Lenin on class analysis and imperialism, the Iranian regime does not even come close to classifying as anti-imperialist—unless one is happy to omit its ever dwindling social class base inside Iran, the exploitative neoliberal political economy over which it presides, its total disregard for basic human rights and freedom, along with its continuing track record of horrific human rights abuses and brutal oppression (directed not least against the various forces that make up the Iranian left).
Yet again, to the ultra-left fence straddles, history ended with the death of Lenin and everything else that occured hitherto doesn't exist.
WW2? What's that? A wrestling competition?
The left forces in the Middle East, and especially in Iran, over the 40 years since the defeat of the popular anti-imperialist 1979 Revolution, have first-hand bitter experiences of “political Islam” and its devastating impact.
That does genuinely suck, no doubt about it. A communist guided Iran in infinitely preferred to the current Iran. But they failed and we have to work with what we got.
With heavy hearts, we recall how the popular 1979 Revolution was hijacked and derailed by the nascent theocracy and the people’s demands for true emancipation and social justice were scorned in favor of a parasitic capitalist class backed by the Islamist force.
See last statement.
We recall how women’s basic rights were trampled upon by the theocratic regime and how Iran’s women and girls were essentially consigned to, at best, second-class citizenry and placed at the mercy of crushing misogyny.
Also bad. That's a given.
And we recall that while Ayatollah Khomeini declared the devastating Iran-Iraq War to be a “blessing,” the Tudeh Party of Iran opposed its continuation beyond Iran’s liberating of its sovereign territory as an imperialist ploy to subvert the Iranian Revolution. As punishment for this—and to display its anti-communist credentials for all to see—the regime launched an unprecedented bloody attack upon the party based on the false premise it had spied for the USSR as well as fabricated “evidence” supplied by the CIA, MI6, and Pakistan’s ISI. Khomeini later referred to this help as “a divine act.”
Folks here's where history gets a bit interesting. During the Iran-Iraq War, both the United States and the NATO bloc AND the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact AND Yugoslavia diplomatically and materially backed Saddam's more secular Iraq, whereas the PRC, DPRK, Israel, the People's Republic of Yemen, Syria, Libiya, and Pakistan supported theocratic iran.
Besides stating the obvious in the fact it was a terrible war, what a bizarre network of supporters.
It is important to note that Iran’s foreign policies in the Middle East region, and consequently its extraterritorial military proxy activities, are predicated on Shia sectarianism and Ayatollah Khomeini’s exhortation to “export the Islamic Revolution.” Aside from running wholly contrary to Iran’s national interests as well as wantonly endangering the Iranian people, this policy bent has proved deeply divisive and unpopular throughout the region and has always manifested to the major detriment of secular, particularly left and progressive, forces.
this is a very strange statement given that Iran supports Syria, which is ruled by Alawites, and also most Palestinians are Sunni. not saying that supporting Shia isn't a big part of the state ideology, but "predicated" makes it sound like if you're not Shia, you're on the missile target list
a bizarre piece all around. some economists assume a can opener; some communists assume a powerful international workers' movement
Hezbollah and Iran were the ones fighting in Syria for non-sectarianism. There's so many stories of grateful kurdish, christian or druze communities lauding honors on Hezbollah for liberating them from ISIS. It's the western backed terrorists that were Sunni sectarian freaks.
I'd add Ansarallah too. they're Shia, but not Twelvers like Iran is. being the same sect of Shi'ism would be a pretty big deal if all you're after is "sectarianism"!
Such a vital alliance cannot simply be comprised of an arbitrary and ad hoc collective of regimes, political forces, and paramilitary organizations united solely by their opportunistic—and often shallow—adversarialism to Washington.
They have never been more incorrect. Such a vital alliance MUST simply by comprised of arbitrary and ad hoc coalition of regimes and political forces. That's the only possible way for such a force to come about given the current geopolitical realities.
By what warped logic can a viciously anti-communist theocratic dictatorship that crushed left-wing parties, banned trade unions, and brutally murdered and disappeared thousands of Iranian left partisans and activists—the true anti-imperialists of Iran—be possibly considered a bastion of anti-imperialism and resistance?
Changing historical and material conditions can place reactionary states into progressive roles.
See: ww2, the damned British empire and that absolute asshole Winston Churchill.
More than four decades of the dominance of “political Islam” under the absolute rule of the Supreme Leader (the supposed “representative of God on Earth”) along with three decades of neoliberal programs have shaped Iran’s economy in accordance with the Washington Consensus and the interests of Western imperialism.
I guess they asked for the sanctions to shape their economy in accordance to Washington's consensus and the interests of Western imperialism.
This has meant that the balance of political forces in Iran has been tilted in favor of a powerful finance-commercial capitalist class whose interests are tied in with those of global capitalism, and it remains the regime’s crucial center of balance—the two being utterly co-dependent.
It is for these reasons that any ostensibly progressive act or alliance on the part of the Iranian regime—including its recent joining of what was the BRICS group—should be looked at through the prism of realpolitik as opposed to taken as somehow representing genuine anti-imperialist intent on its part.
Changing historical and material conditions is pushing reactionary states into progressive roles, whether they want to or not.
To defend the Iranian state as a force for anti-imperialism is, at best, naive—and, at worst, deliberately relegates the brutal repression, crushing poverty, and socioeconomic misery suffered by the people of Iran as inconsequential or unworthy of consideration.
Please lecture Stalin's grave about how he deliberately relegates the brutal repression, crushing poverty, and socioeconomic misery suffered by the peoples of the western allied states as inconsequential or unworthy of consideration.
It is also an affront to Iran’s left and progressive forces who continue to struggle valiantly to bring about the transition of their country from a situation of dictatorship to one where a national democratic transformation is possible.
The struggles for democracy, human rights, social justice, and against dictatorship go hand in hand with those for peace, sovereignty, and against imperialism. They are interdependent and inseparable.
I really do with them the best of luck with regards to their situation.
That said, material results of crushing America's and Israel's chokehold on the region speak louder than any written word.
More than four decades of the dominance of “political Islam” under the absolute rule of the Supreme Leader (the supposed “representative of God on Earth”) along with three decades of neoliberal programs have shaped Iran’s economy in accordance with the Washington Consensus and the interests of Western imperialism.
This logic is so fucking stupid. Actually we have to regurgitate the US State Department line on Iran because Iran is pro-western! What the fuck ultras, you are completely incomprehensible
Men make history but not in the circumstances that they create.
So we just won't make history until the perfect vanguard party prophecy reveals itself,, I'm just going to hang out and enjoy the treats of western imperialism. (Enjoy while you can, smoke if you got 'em).
Am I wrong in saying that "death to America" includes the CPUSA?
This shit is why I think calls to organize in America are premature. What is the purpose of telling people to join an org when this is the rhetoric coming from the countries biggest org? The policy makers and spokes people of CPUSA are quite clearly not comrades. Even Kautsky wasn't this bad.
This shit is why I think calls to organize in America are premature. What is the purpose of telling people to join an org when this is the rhetoric coming from the countries biggest org
If you don't have an ideologically strong leninist party built and disciplined cadre trained by the time rubber hits the road then you will trip and eat shit because you weren't ready to go and you'll end up with a fascist state that's so bad it'll actually miss the current clowns and dipshits we see running the country.
I know that with everything I've learned, if I did nothing to fight for a better future, my life would feel hollow and worthless. That's why I do the work I do, as little as it feels to me sometimes.