The DPRK's history has been a rollercoaster, with admirable highs and heartbreaking lows, most notably the Korean War and the fall of the USSR. Its steadfast commitment to Juche, a variant of Marxism-Leninism that focuses on self-sufficiency, has both made the DPRK a target for imperialist genocidal powers, and allowed them to survive these attacks.
Lately, we seem to be seeing a transition from surviving to thriving. China and the DPRK have always had a much more complicated history than Western education and media allows its population to know, with periods of quite strong disagreement - it's not the case that China is somehow the DPRK's master. Russia is the DPRK's other neighour that isn't US-occupied, and while they obviously differ substantially in ideology since the USSR fell, the tsunami of sanctions on Russia has changed things. The stick has been removed from the equation, with Russia facing no possible punishment from the West because they were unable to enact sanctions effectively and used all their ammunition in the first few barrages rather than turning the screws over time (I don't care if we're on the 14th sanctions package, it's all been meaningless for Russia since the end of 2022).
The carrot is also more visible, with an alliance making a lot of sense for both. Once again, Western education and media would have you believe a Parenti-esque reality in which Korea is a massive and unpredictable danger to the world, but is simultaneously so poor and destitute that their artillery pieces are made of wood and their missiles out of paper-mache. The truth is that Korea has innovated greatly in missile technology, with some of their weapons matching or even exceeding those of the Russians, hence the Russians' use of them in Ukraine. Russia also finds it advantageous to invest in Korea to strengthen the anti-hegemonic alliance's presence in the Pacific, countering the US-occupied lower half of the peninsula who has naturally sided with Ukraine. Additionally, Russia is investing deeply in the Arctic sea route. This will open up as climate change continues; is naturally quite defensible for Russia so long as Korea is there to provide further defense at its eastern edge; and is both a faster and safer route for Russia to access China - especially in a world where straits can be blockaded by even impoverished yet determined countries like Yemen. The situation in the Red Sea benefits Russia and China now, but in the coming years, the US may apply the same lesson for their own benefit elsewhere.
It is perhaps this new sense of self-confidence that has let Korea give up on reunification with its lower half via peaceful measures. A new Korean War would be devastating for both sides even if it remained non-nuclear, but with a rising DPRK and with the South falling yet further into hypercapitalist exploitation and misery, and a US that remains non-committal to its "allies" when times get difficult (as in Ukraine and Europe), a reality where Korea may finally hold the upper hand and have the ability to liberate its south may be approaching in the years and decades to come.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is *the DPRK! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
McDonald's is buying all of its restaurants back from the Israeli franchise owner due to the negative impact of the boycott of McDonald's on its Middle East revenue. McDonalds missed it's revenue target for the first time in 4 years because of the boycott.
Consumers around the world but particularly in Arab and Muslim-majority countries have boycotted the brand over what they perceive to be its support for Israel — which the chain's management denies — following the move by Israel's franchise branch to provide free McDonald's meals to Israeli soldiers after the Hamas-led terror attacks of Oct. 7 that killed roughly 1,200 people in Israel and took a further 253 hostage.
The Israel-Hamas war has now killed at least 33,000 people in the blockaded Gaza Strip, according to the enclave's Health Ministry, and the conflict has triggered what the U.N. and World Health Organization warn is impending famine for more than half a million people.
the "Hamas-led terror attacks of Oct. 7 that killed roughly 1,200 people in Israel" vs "the Israel-Hamas war has now killed at least 33,000 people"
It's weird how often McDonalds has been brought up in the news thread. There was russian knock off McDonalds being started up and this is just a followup to the different McDonalds branches taking opposing positions after October 7th. Like, what will happen to McDonalds when President Xi opens the third front in Taiwan?
so let me get this right... To avoid being boycotted for doing business with israel... Mcdicks is buying stores from israel... which they will use to sell burgers to israelis in israel?
The restaurants were being boycotted because they were owned by one Israeli company. To avoid the collapse of McDonald’s as a brand in the Middle East, McDonald’s corporate chose to buy out the Israeli company’s operations.
Edit: actually to clarify. The Israeli company that owned the franchises in Israel gave meals to soldiers and shit and that immediately prompted a backlash throughout the Middle East with boycotts leading to 50 to 90% sales declines month over month. McDonald’s corporate elected to buy out the israeli company’s ops to avoid further brand erosion and association with Israel and IDF
I think they aren't giving out free meals to the IDF anymore but don't quote me on that. That might have ended a while ago. It's kind of a weird situation, because the guy who owned the Israeli McDonalds franchise rights is actually very openly against the settlements.
They are also probably buying well over market price since they are doing it for PR reasons, meaning the Israeli company is cashing out and being rewarded for assisting with the genocide. It’s the opposite of what botcotters wanted McDonalds to do.
If McDonalds actually wanted to get off the boycott list they would just terminate all their franchise agreements in Israel and refund any franchise dues, and then sue any Israeli McDonalds that tries to stay open. Instead their plan is to reward the genociders with tons of cash, and then continue operations in Israel.