Elon Musk's X Is Suspending Accounts That Reveal a Neo-Nazi Cartoonist's Alleged Identity
Elon Musk's X Is Suspending Accounts That Reveal a Neo-Nazi Cartoonist's Alleged Identity
Researchers and journalists have been blocked on X from sharing the alleged identity of the neo-Nazi cartoonist Stonetoss.
You're viewing a single thread.
Sure would be a shame if someone linked to the original doxxing
Edit: it’s actually a great read. You can skip some parts if you want, like all the BS cartoons (do they need that many examples?)
121 3 ReplyBeing reported as doxxing, but I don't see anything in our rules or the lemmy.world rules that would block this.
I'll float it to the admins and see what they say.
32 2 ReplyI mean, it was doxxing, but it’s sort of common knowledge since this was published. They ripped the band aid off and now the info is everywhere. It’s sort of pointless to delete it if it’s already out there imo
Edit: Also, if you want to be a fuckin celebrity, deal with it. You got doxxed. You can’t really be famous and anonymous. It’s one thing when it’s Guliani calling on people to harass some random ass election workers, it’s another when you’re kinda famous
42 1 Replyif you want to be a fuckin celebrity, deal with it.
Did this big smelly butthole wanna be a celebrity or wanna sell crappy merch and hate people?
When I try to remove my bias…
Would I expect Elmousk to remove my real name if I made comics shitting on nazi buttplugs like in the OP?
Legit question. I should be able to make anti-nazi comics without getting firebombed, period.
Buttt I kinda deserve to get fired if I’m employed by a pro-nazi boss and my infosec sucks and my name leaks.
Any of y’all got answers?
12 0 ReplyThis isn't doxxing, it's reporting on doxxing.
Completely different and totally cool!
10 1 ReplyWell, what I linked to was the original doxxing
4 0 ReplyYou're innocent!
5 1 Reply
Doxing is permitted at the instance level? Wow
7 12 ReplyThat's where I expected to find it, but it's oddly silent on the issue.
5 1 ReplyIt's not, but the phrasing could be stronger:
https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/#2-respecting-other-users-privacy-doxing
4 1 ReplyErm, doxxing is allowed because we’re the good guys.
4 15 Reply
My work is similar to those often featured by Charlie Hebdo, published in the New York Times, and shown on Family Guy
Guy thinks pretty highly of his shitty cartoons.
28 1 ReplyLemme guess his bio:
About Me: <see: Jesus Christ>
4 1 ReplyHah, my work is similar, that's brilliant actually.
As I'm writing this comment I'm using words often used by William Shakespeare, Winston Churchill, Lady Gaga, as well as words featured in the King James Bible.
3 0 Reply
I appreciate that they included as much information as they did to really solidify their points.
23 1 ReplyOh, that one
18 0 ReplySpeaking with the admins, I'm going to remove this comment based on this lemmy.world policy:
https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/#2-respecting-other-users-privacy-doxing
The phrasing is a little vague, there's some discussion on re-writing it and what the definition of "publicly available" is.
If things change and the comment is allowed under the new phrasing, I'll restore it. For now we're choosing to err on the side of caution.
4 6 Replyor that it is publicly available information
Isn’t it though? That’s sort of the point of the article. Also, his name is now publicly available many places.
6 0 ReplyWe're treating it like this, if reputable news sources aren't allowing it, then we aren't allowing it either.
4 0 ReplyFair enough
3 0 Reply