Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Accused of Gang-Rape of 17-Year-Old Girl
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Accused of Gang-Rape of 17-Year-Old Girl
Sean "Diddy" Combs was accused in a lawsuit on Wednesday of gang-raping a 17-year-old girl in 2003.
Sean “Diddy” Combs was accused in a lawsuit on Wednesday of gang-raping a 17-year-old girl in 2003, marking the fourth sexual assault allegation lodged against the producer in recent weeks.
The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, alleges that she was flown on a private jet from Michigan to Combs’ recording studio in New York, where she was raped by three people, including Combs and Harve Pierre, the president of Bad Boy Entertainment.
According to the suit, Combs and his associates plied her with “copious amounts” of drugs and alcohol. The suit alleges that Combs raped her over a bathroom sink while she went in and out of consciousness, and that Combs then watched as a third man also raped her.
You're viewing a single thread.
Look, I'm sorry, but I'm beginning to think this guy's a real jerk.
y'all think he did it? I'm starting to think he did it.
Absolutely, but she was probably willing at the time.
I don't think most people are above having sex with rich and famous people then trying to receive money if they think they can get it. It's just human nature.
She was underage at the time.
Yeah, I think she was 17.
Is that what you would do?
Given the replies and upvotes in this thread, there’s quite a few people who would happily fuck a child.
If I was 17 I could easily see myself having sex with a rich and powerful lady.
I don't think I would try to get money out of it cause I'm not a shitty person though.
Seventeen year olds can't consent. They're incapable under the law. So even if she was into it, she literally couldn't say yes. So it's rape.
If that's something you disagree with, then work to get the law changed. But until that, they're rapists and don't blame the victim.
Permanently Deleted
Therapy might help with everything you said.
I think going outside would help you understand better.
Permanently Deleted
This is straight up incorrect. 17 is the age of consent in New York, and many other states are 16. A minority of states have 18 as the age of consent.
I agree it’s fucked up for an adult and a teen to be together, but this is a law we’re talking about.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_the_United_States
The US still sets it higher than most places.
In Germany 14 and 40 is a legal relationship.
That’s fucking disgusting.
Berlin was publicly placing foster kids with pedophiles as late as the early 2000s because "they like kids more".
The judges involved are still sitting, despite the project being over after 30 years.
It was called the Kentler project.
Oh my god those poor kids :(
Permanently Deleted
I wasn't talking about the law.
I had sex at 17 with an adult and have 0 regrets. It's pretty normal. I think I would've had more regrets if I refrained from doing it because people like you think that's what I should do, lol.
To put things into perspective and why it's always good to talk specifics, I was 17 and she was 20. I guess she's a shitty person who raped me and should be in prison, lol. We ended up being together for years, it was a great relationship :)
But I guess from your 'logic', if this occurred in a different jurisdiction (or if I had waited 2 months for my 18th birthday,) then she would be off the hook for any and all judgement.
It's funny watching you people always pivot to the law as though every law is just and people are good based on how well they obey laws.
Permanently Deleted
I frankly don’t care how your relationship turned out.
Okay. Then why should I care about your input on such relationships?
Legally, she raped you.
Legally, I don't really care. Legally, smoking weed was against the law but I did it anyways. So is piracy. So is jaywalking.
You clearly only care about what is and isn't illegal. In your mind, it's okay to have sex with 14 year olds under the right jurisdiction. In my mind, it's not okay even if the law says otherwise.
I'd say my experience is more the norm than an exception, at least for males. I'm glad I don't let people like you influence me. I'd say that would be way more traumatizing, lol.
In your mind, it's okay to have sex with 14 year olds under the right jurisdiction
Don’t you dare put those words in my mouth. That’s not at all what I said.
Legally, I don't really care. Legally, smoking weed was against the law but I did it anyways. So is piracy. So is jaywalking.
None of those involve other people’s consent and are all victimless crimes. Dear lord how are you this dense.
I'm glad I don't let people like you influence me. I'd say that would be way more traumatizing, lol.
You know what’s traumatizing? Being raped. My years of therapy agree.
Don’t you dare put those words in my mouth. That’s not at all what I said.
Really? You seem to only care about what the law says. So you admit that it's possible for the law to be incorrect about consent? Is it okay to have sex with 16 year olds if the law says so? At what point do you draw the line between what you find acceptable and what the law finds acceptable? Your entire argument in this entire thread chain has been "it's illegal" when I've said time and time again I'm not referring to the law.
None of those involve other people’s consent and are all victimless crimes. Dear lord how are you this dense.
Yeah, me having sex at 17 with a 20 year old was a victimless crime. However, I think you're delusional and patronizing enough to ignore this fact.
You know what’s traumatizing? Being raped. My years of therapy agree.
I mean, that applies to you. Not me. Why would I avoid having sex at 17 because of what happened to you? Lol.
It seems your letting your own experiences dictate what everyone else should experience. Hopefully with time you will come to realize that's just not the world we live in. Everyone is different, and most people are cool with having sex at 17 even if it's illegal.
Unfortunately there are still states where like 16 and 15 are the ages of consent
Permanently Deleted
Well it seems fortunate for quite a few folks in this thread evidently.
I saw your deleted reply; no I don’t think it’s appropriate, see my comment.
First off: there is no federal age of consent law. You weren’t “going off” anything.
What you said is factually untrue. You’d see that with a quick search. That’s all I’m saying.
No, I don’t think it’s appropriate. It is, however fucked up, still legal.
Permanently Deleted
You’re an insufferable prick. See ya
Permanently Deleted
I mean, having sex with people of certain ages is illegal for a reason so it doesn't actually matter if she was "willing" if she was under the age of consent. Also, drugging a person removes their ability to make an informed decision to consent so again, even if she did agree to it, her consent wasn't valid on that point either. In other words, she wasn't capable of consenting so, ya know, rape.
I'm not talking about convicting the perpetrator. Please stop assuming, lol.
Legally speaking, there is no ambiguity.
But in reality, there is. If you can't understand that, it's probably because you don't want to.
Fuck off with that shit.
You know, everyone keeps saying "the worst part is the hypocrisy," but I disagree. I think the worst part was the raping.
(I feel kind of bad making this joke in this thread, but on the other hand... Norm. So...)
Big F to my boy Norm
Thats a bit premature /s