Yes. We are taught to "Print" first, and then taught cursive but reassured its not that serious or important to know how, because we will be expected to write in print on everything academic.
Wow, I love that. American education did the same thing 50 years ago, but we made this change towards forcing students to write print. Nowadays they probably type a lot more than write, but there are still some brutally long written essays.
You can scoff but back in the old days before computers were that common academic papers were required to be printed not in cursive because it was hard to read cursive.
So academia has always used print.
Seriously go look at scans of research papers written in the 19th century, and tell me that you can understand a word of what they're saying.
In are first year in the 90s we were taught block letters - plain text. In our second year we were taught what England would call "fancy", only we were taught it as if it were a different language to plain text, named cursive, which is really only used for signing your name on checks. In the 00s this switched to typing, so no one after the 90s learned how to read it.
What about when they want to read an old letter from a relative, study notes from a senior, archive document, manuscript of work of literature they love or a fancy font ?