Once again, it depends what they mean. What do they mean by 'collect information' and what do they mean by 'categories of things'. Because I like learning about things, I like going on research dives and learning odd bits of information. But I don't think I approach it in such a systematic way that this question suggests.
I checked against an extended version of the same test (AQ-50), and this question had some added clarification;
(e.g. types of car, types of bird, types of train, types of plant, etc.).
I could be interested in learning about any of those, but it would not be motivated by its belonging to the category. It would be if the particular car, bird, etc had some inherent interest, or was relevant to something else I was involved with
Okay, if I was going to learn about fish, it might go something like "I mentioned to someone about how spawning salmon return to their place of birth. But is that actually true?" *Learns about salmon life-cycle. *Learns about biological study of animal migration. *Learns about migration in different animals. *Learns about how understanding has developed over time. *Learns how it influenced ideas on geoscience, commerce, anthropology
It's like I'm on a random walk through the tree of knowledge, rather than cataloguing a few select branches.
I do like how the class of lobe-finned fish can be interpreted to include human beings. That just tickles me.