You're viewing a single thread.
805
comments
You do know that individual houses can also have trees, right? Why are you ignoring that?
Having trees != ecosystem. The mere presence of tons of roads, buildings, and infrastructure (not to mention monocultured grass lawns, pesticides, herbicides, etc.) is super disruptive to ecosystems. If our cities needlessly sprawl all over the place, we're forced to drive more, pollute more, spend more (all that infrastructure and cars are super expensive!), and our built environment disrupts much more actual ecosystems.
True, but having them is still better than not, and it's bad faith to pretend like it doesn't matter.
You've viewed 805 comments.