A little consistency would be welcome
A little consistency would be welcome
A little consistency would be welcome
As a rule of thumb, if you want to know who is the most evil in a war, it's generally the ones doing the genocide.
Some people seem to not get that point.
You'll never believe this, but sometimes Putin doesn't tell the truth.
No the fact they are stealing kids and killing civilians does.
You are one of three things IMO: tankie, shill, or dumb.
Oh joy a flase binary.
Dude. Neither are good, and I perfer neither.
You are not in good faith.
Dude. Neither are good, and I perfer neither.
Then we agree.
You are not in good faith.
Why? Because I'm questioning whether or not Russia is committing a genocide?
Yep.
Da, tavarish.
Not recognizing a distinct culture and trying to kill them because they want to be distinct is literally genocide.
Giving the ultimatum of "You can be Russian or you can die" when the victims are saying "We're Ukrainian, not Russian" is literally genocide.
Where did you read that Russia made this ultimatum?
Lol is that not what's happening?
Your original comment suggested that's what was happening, too. But it got deleted, so I can't quote you on it directly.
The russians
Yes it fucking can.
Czechs and Germans. The Germans viewed around 1 third of Czechs, if I remember the number right, as being suitable for German "breeding". Guess what the rest were? The Czechs were Germans, they just needed a little "cleaning". (I'm just reiterating a disgusting Nazi view. I think it's very clear I don't support it, but I want to be crystal clear)
How is Ukraine comparable? The Nazis had their mad eugenics. What is Russia supposedly doing that's comparable? Is Russia following some eugenicist policy?
So what you're saying is, doing stuff like bombing children's hospitals is acceptable to you, so long as they're not doing it for eugenics?
Would you like to explain to me how Turkiye has never genocided Kurds, whom they regard as "Mountain Turks"?
Are you really that uneducated about how two things can simultaneously be correct while it is at odds of your limited understanding?
So you don't understand.
You refuse to understand.
No, you refuse to explain.
Look dude, if you skipped that class in high-school it's not my responsibility to bring tou up to speed.
Though with the amount of contrarian posts you have made on the topic, I'm not convinced you would listen.