Skip Navigation

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context
65 comments
  • Hey genius, I already did. I even provided visuals. Not sure what else I could do. You have pictures, you have a Wikipedia page. You either have the ability to parse a secondary school level explanation or you don’t. If you don’t, that’s on you.

    • But I don't see how any of that has anything to do with this article or this thread. So I still don't know what you are trying to say. You can assume my agenda and my lack of intelligence all day.

      Still doesn't change the fact that I'm going to keep posting. Thanks, friend! :)

      • I don’t need to assume anything. You offer all the proof necessary with your pattern of behavior. Thanks, bud! Good luck with those resources I provided!

        • If I’m really such a troll, wouldn’t the best strategy be to stop engaging altogether? Every response just boosts the view count and engagement on my posts. If attention is supposedly what I crave, then ignoring me would be the quickest way to make me "go away," right?

          Constant replies are actually feeding what you claim to hate, so maybe letting it fade into obscurity would be the logical move—if that’s really what you want.

          And if my trolling is so obvious, then you don't have to worry about pointing it out, because as many have said, "every sees through" me. Right?

          I mean, the only problem with that scenario is that I'm not a troll. And I have posted articles that are critical of Trump, Stein, and Harris, as well as articles praising each of them.

          So the conflicting perspectives of stuff I post doesn't really fit you narrative, but meh, just some room for thought I guess.

          • Nice try, but I’m certain everyone knows that “view counts” aren’t actually a thing on Internet forums. This isn’t Twitter. And this isn’t your personal website. Nothing is being boosted aside from unflattering ratios by people responding to your bullshit. So essentially, every response that calls out your misinformation and propaganda is beneficial to keeping misinformation and propaganda controlled.

            You see… Free speech on social media is a double-edged sword. We all want it protected, but it comes at the cost of allowing disruptive bad actors to keep their voice.

            So the only recourse is to vigorously call these people out.

            And that is what is going to continue to happen.

          • but meh, just some room for thought I guess

            It’s “food for thought” - are you sure you’re a native English speaker? You seem to have big problems with both idiom and reading comprehension.

            • Meh, stubby fingers, tiny phone screen. But I'll keep as is, cuz I like the idea of room for thought.

              What language do you think I'm native in, if not English? Are you trying to imply something?

              Come on, friend, you can say it out loud. Just say it...

              • Hmm, not sure how stubby fingers get “food” to “room” - especially as we know from your frequent misspellings and constant editing of your previous posts, you obviously disabled auto-correct.

                And I didn’t imply anything, just asked a question as you seem to be constantly confused by common American English phrases - especially so for someone who is a native English speaker, and generally poor reading comprehension. “I don’t know what that means” is probably one of your five most common replies in comments.

You've viewed 65 comments.