Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)UH
usernamesaredifficul [he/him] @ usernamesaredifficul @hexbear.net
Posts
3
Comments
1,733
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I agree that letting kids chose what to study is a good thing but I think that's more for older kids for a number of reasons.

    1 - they need some experience with the subject to know if they like it and it would be a shame if they gave up on maths or history entirely because of a bad impression at the very beginning stage when if they got to know the subject better they might love it

    2 - young children if left to their own devices probably won't do the early childhood work they need to. Children mature as they age and I would argue it's abusive to give them responsibility for their decisions before they are old enough to make them properly

    3 - society and the children themselves do need them to have a baseline level of knowledge in various subjects.

  • if when you learned geometry for example you also learned about Pythagoras and the ancient Greeks

    that would slow it down quite a bit though. Are you sure you aren't just more interested in history and philosophy than maths. Because I did get taught historical context along with my maths and science lessons and found it hopelessly boring.

    Maths would do better to be taught as the creative subject it is. I had a really fun maths teacher who taught us how once you understand how an equation works you can apply it to solve a variety of problems in interesting ways.

    I think the way schools teach obedience is less in the subjects themselves but the constructed social atmosphere. The calling people sir, the being grouped into classes and forced to stand in lines, we had one PE teacher that would make us do punishments from WW1 for backtalking (there's some historical context for you!) the fact it was a collective punishment also didn't help

  • systems don't have to be good they have to be good enough

    our education system basically produces as many people as we need taught to the standard we need. It isn't better because it doesn't have to be and institutions have inertia

  • As I understand it we imported it from China because it was a system that allowed education at greater scale than Europes previous system of having a conversation with the examiner. It lets lots of people sit the same exam at once

    to say capitalism strives for greater efficiency is false it strives for greater scale

    Now we stick with it because we've been doing it 200 years and people are used to it

  • I think I just don't understand how people can have their hobby be related to their work without imploding. I had a cousin who became a proffessional chef and he cooked for fun. That job almost overwhelmed him because he had no escape from its stresses.

    I would worry about that happening to me with coding