theunknownmuncher @ theunknownmuncher @lemmy.world

Posts

4

Comments

892

Joined

1 yr. ago

Yep, it's absolutely extremely incredibly absurdly lucky and convenient that he just happened to be carrying a confession and the gun on his person for the cops to "find".

Otherwise, they would never have been able to connect him to the crime and wouldn't have a prosecutable case, eyebrow pics just aren't enough.

Finding the ghost gun in his posession is literally the only way it could have been useful evidence against him, if they had found it ditched at the scene or in any other place, it couldn't have been traced to him without doubt. Why would he still have had it when the whole point of using a ghost gun is to ditch it?

If you spend any amount of time engaging with "influencer" social media content, then you likely have a skewed perspective and damaged self image.

The police failed to read his Miranda rights and performed an illegal search when arresting him. One officer began to search his bag when another officer told her that she needed a warrant to do it. She repacked the bag, turned off her bodycam, then 11 minutes later turns it back on and continued to search it without a warrant:

Patrolwoman Wasser continued her warrantless search of the backpack. Patrolwoman Wasser first re-opened the same backpack compartment that she had started searching at the McDonald’s before immediately closing that compartment and opening the front compartment of the backpack as if she was specifically looking for something. Instantly, she “found” a handgun in the front compartment.

The cops planted the gun. Of course its a "ghost gun", super convenient that it's impossible to prove whether or not he owned it. Guess we just have to take the cops good word on it 🙄 and the entire point of one is to ditch it at the scene or shortly afterwards without risk, so it makes no sense that he still had it on him. Luigi doesn't look like the shooter in any of the other videos or pictures. The whole story of him being caught doesn't make sense, either. The shooter put in a great effort to escape while remaining untraceable, but then was randomly found, with no leads or connections, hanging around in public at a mcdonalds, literally carrying around a confession and the gun, instead of lying low??? Oh come on, if you wouldn't believe that garbage as the plot of a crime show on TV, it's reasonable doubt. He's innocent. The end.

https://gizmodo.com/luigi-mangiones-legal-defense-fundraiser-tops-1-million-2000598676

https://cdn.sanity.io/files/detu0qji/production/1b9e211bd3c7770699b4244c4e9bc5074498ee82.pdf

Actually, nope! Claiming that you personally didn't learn with an IDE and that there are make-believe scenarios where one is not available is not actually addressing the argument.

There really aren't any situations that make any sense at all where an IDE is not available. I've worked in literally the most strict and locked down environments in the world, and there is always approved software and tools to use... because duh! Of course there is, silly, work needs to get done. Unless you're talking about a coding 101 class or something academic and basic. Anyway, that's totally irrelevant regardless, because its PURE fantasy to have access to something like Claude and not have access to an IDE. So your argument is entirely flawed and invalid.

It's telling that you're focused on personal assumptions instead of addressing the argument

No you can't if you don't know the libraries

IDE.

Python is entirely dependent on what libraries you include

??

If you don't know what you need you can't do shit.

IDE.

The problems you propose in your comment are not only greatly exaggerated but already been solved for decades using conventional tools AND apply to literally all languages, having nothing at all to do with python. Good try! My statement holds true.

Maybe your assumption is that you're in a cave writing code in pencil on paper, but that's not a typical working condition. If you have access to Claude to use as a crutch, then you have access to search for an available python library and read some "Getting Started" paragraphs.

Seriously, if the only real value that AI provides is "you don't need to know the libraries you're using" 💀 that's not quite as strong of an argument as you think it is lmaooo "knowing the libraries" isn't exactly an existing challenge or software engineering problem that people struggle with...

Anyone who already knows another programming language but has never used python in their life can write a simple python app quickly, regardless

Kagi is all in on AI. Its the AI slop version of a search ranking algorithm

A chair is less to deal with than a room full of balls

Bro watched Qatar gift Trump a $400m jet and host a $1.5m per plate dinner, then was like "corruption in order to appease Trump???? ReDdIt CoNsPiRaCy!!! I must reach for a much less plausible explanation!!!!" 🤡

We both know this is the Ellison family killing a show to appease Trump, a show that they also don't politically agree with, in order to complete the merger that Trump's administration must approve. In this poltical climate, you're just playing dumb.

They're just supposed to give up the entire business model of the majority of consumer internet services???

Also just because the computations are encrypted does not mean you won't be able to track database accesses and other signals to understand what information the request contained.

In real life, they don't drop their guns to "settle it like men"

It is actually 2 flavors of the same party. The USA is a one-party state, controlled by the capitalist party.

EDIT: lol you can downvote me while you decide whether you want to vote for the Israel-defending-capitalist-that-ran-on-"securing"-the-border or the other Israel-defending-capitalist-that-ran-on-"securing"-the-border 🤪

Don't want him literally jumping out of his shoes like in Butler 🤭

The earliest evidence we have for things like symbolic language and abstract art is more like 50-100’000 years ago. That’s what most people mean by behaviourally modern.

You edited your reply to add this entire sentence, after I replied to it, otherwise your original comment would have had nothing at all to do with behavioral modernity and wasn't relevant to the discussion...

Ok

"Depends what you mean by behaviourally modern." immediately begins defining anatomically modern lmao yup you know what you're talking about fr

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_modernity

There is no one definition, as it is debated. If you define it by control of fire, then it's about 2 million years back.

EDIT: nice, you edited your comment to add a blurb that's actually relevant to behavioral modernity now 👍 looks like you learned something from the wikipedia article

Yeah, people have no concept of how old people are. Behavioral modern humans have been walking around for 2.5 million years