theunknownmuncher @ theunknownmuncher @lemmy.world

Posts

4

Comments

782

Joined

1 yr. ago

So firstly, shut up, nerd. You’ve clearly never worked a corporate job and don’t understand the compulsion to in-house nothing.

I WISH. Would have saved so much headache from rolling our own framework for the millionth time instead of using standard solution that already exists... Tell me you've never worked in corporate software without telling me you've never worked in corporate software.

Secondly, approximately 0.0% of chatbot users will ever run an LLM at home.

Wut. Individual models on huggingface have monthly downloads in the hundreds of thousands... Just Deepseek R1 was downloaded 550,000 times in the last month alone. Gemma 3n was downloaded over 120,000 times in the last 7 days.

Thirdly, it’s slow as hell even on a top-end home Nvidia card — and the data centre cards are expensive.

They literally run well on mobile phones and laptops lol.

The author is desperately grasping at straws at best, intentionally making up false claims at worst... either way, they aren't qualified to write on this subject.

No Man's Sky was one of the most hyped video games in history due to procedural generation. The fact that they botched it on release is not relevant.

No, you're responding to a strawman like "Christians are the only hateful people" and explaining how other people could also be hateful. That is not what I said, and your reply is not relevant.

Christians are the most hateful people. Their made-up framework for the universe that revolves around judgement of sins and being God's super special buddy allows them to feel holier than thou and justify their mistreatment of others. Every misdeed comes with an exception and automatic forgiveness for them, because they're a true believer, while every perceived or imagined misdeed from others is proof that others should be condemned.

Ngl I stopped reading your comments after you equated generative AI to slavery and revealed that you are a troll arguing in bad faith

Meanwhile in reality, Christians continue to be the most hateful people...

The funny part is the leak could only have come from inside his administration and party because he withheld briefings from his political opponents

They were both posted by the same user

It's literally just implementation and they're both statistical models, but 👍

If you disagree, explain how. I'll wait

no wonder you hail AI as good

When, exactly, did I? I called them both janky dogshit, but simply pointed out the very real hypocrisy of supporting procedural generation while hating generative AI.

Literally everything you just said applies to procedural generation, except that it is demonic because that's just silly

by your logic, slavery would be excusable. That's the argument you're making.

I'm sorry, we're talking about the implementation of generated content in video games. That only works if it's EQUIVALENT to slavery, it's not (which you yourself said in an attempt to have it both ways lol), so "my logic" does not apply to slavery... Dude.

Yes, of course I did, it would be gross of me to let that slide

Totally valid, mutually conceded. I'd bet we can agree that the current climate of games generally praises procedurally generated content, regardless of how we experienced its history.

👀 SLAVERY??? Come on man. Outrageous.

theunknownmuncher thinks it's somehow inconsistent to be against generative AI while being ok with procedural generation, which implies that they think they're equivalent in some way.

It's genuinely wild that you wrote this and then minutes later tried to make a "comparison but totally NOT equivalency, guys" to SLAVERY. 🤦🤦🤦

EDIT: btw, not that it matters at this point, but that's not what a simile is. It is analogy, though, but a super flawed and shitty one

Your previous comment proved my point, thanks

both are used to produce more content with less effort. There's your equivalence.

Bingo.

As if the reason people don't like generative AI is because it makes bad games.

Nice, point proven. 😎 If it doesn't make games bad, then the complaints are simply invalid and bandwagoning, and developers cannot be faulted for using it. LOL

I'm not and it's always been consistently praised.

LOL care to educate us on why a statistical model is unacceptable while a procedural model (also statistical 🙃) is acceptable, then? 🤔 I'll wait.

(reality: it's a minor implementation detail and has no relevance to the user)

And yet you couldn't describe one aspect of the differences 🤔

Super weird take, honestly. Procedurally generated content gets no hate, despite it being janky dogshit, too.

EDIT: lol your downvotes don't make your opinion more consistent

Jokes aside, no they aren't "defending Reddit from AI" they are defending exclusivity on monetizing their users and their user's content