Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
199
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • What exactly did they say that made you draw this conclusion? I'm so curious

  • Ukrainian genocide? Where is this even coming from?

    Regardless, your comment reveals the answer to your dilemma. If the question is how many genocides/oppressions you are willing to put up with, then it's a system worth abolishing. If one party commits 4 genocides and the other 5, then would you choose the one committing 4? There is necessarily a point where both parties are doing so badly, they're indistinguishable and they are both crossing the red lines, that applies for everyone of us, no exceptions. So the question then remains, where do you draw the line for this?

    Another example I usually give for this is: one party being Hitler and the other being Hitler but he is giving a little bit more money to the healthcare system. Would you vote for Hitler? No, so you have to draw the line somewhere. We draw it at a genocide(and at numerous more issues which are for another discussion)

  • I know you'd wish that, but unfortunately genocide is too much for me and the least evil argument doesn't hold up anymore. There are red lines and dnc has absolutely crossed them. I'm not expecting you to understand, you clearly don't care enough about the genocide.

  • I wouldn't know since I am not a republican. I'm just absolutely not ok with the Palestinian genocide, but you care so little that you only seen republicans, regardless if the critique comes from the right or from the left. You'd wish you could make me look like a republican.

  • Rather unfortunate for you that the folks complaining about dnc being 100% complicit and funding the genocide, have never ever claimed that Trump is the better choice.

    Also I love the genocide in quotes, really says all you need to know

  • Pretty unfortunate for you that there's free speech then huh? Not letting you spew your dnc propaganda undisturbed

  • Ok because I see a lot of stupid shit in here, you don't get to talk about banning tiktok if you don't talk about banning Instagram, Reddit, X and YouTube, who use the same formula, with equal fervour.

    Now please talk about healthcare, climate crisis, the Palestinian ethnic cleansing by that cancerous, land grabbing, terrorist Israeli state and the shrinking buying power of the people all around the world.

  • Is that so? Here's your 400k rubles ticket then

  • "brought unprecedented war to Gaza"???

    Last time I checked, that's Israel's business. Yk turning Gaza into an open air prison, oppressing, stealing the land of the Palestinians, murdering them and torturing them, ethnically cleansing them...?

    As much as you'd love to tarnish Palestinians liberation struggle, facts don't really allow that. You're just another genocide apologist

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • These mfs will use literally anything except for open source, decentralised social meda

  • Some other country would be in their place. Every country given the chance commits atrocities, check history. Sometimes I wonder what the world would be without countries.

  • What are you talking about? The asshole works as a die. Extrusion is about deforming the object, it doesn't have to change its general "shape". If there is plastic deformation, which there is as stated(unless you hold it in unhealthily long), then it counts. You extrude a cylinder with a big cross section to one with a smaller cross section.

  • I'm not mad, I'm just trying to express how little this accomplishes besides pr. Maybe you've forgotten how he was the first to ban Palestinian flags and protests, deeming them as terrorist.

  • I never realized that this process is basically a biological cold extrusion.

  • That'll show them!! Netanyahu is shaking rn. Honestly fuck Macron

  • Ayn Rand's fountainhead, by a fat mile. I was young and didn't know better

  • What in the world do you mean "you expect our energy demands to stay the same or decrease?". What does expect mean??? I don't expect anything, I'm stating what needs to be done if we want our planet to remain habitable...have you heard about climate change or...? Also how do you keep ignoring the fact that our wealth has increased by 500% in the last 30 years and the 1% gets all the profit? We don't need to increase our economic activities for all the people to be able to live comfortably, we need distribute wealth fairly and when we get to a point where everyone can live well, (in the West we are way past that point) then we need to scale down unnecessary economic activities, if we want to meet the scientific guidelines to avoid the 3 degrees by the end of the century, which would spell absolute irreversible disaster.

    I never said it's a US problem, and I didn't make it sound like so, I was only using some data from the US for convenience. It's a worldwide problem, but the US dictates the trajectory and policies of a very big part of the world including Europe, Canada, Australia and the gulf countries, all of which are essentially controlled by them. Also the US has by far the most CO2 emissions historically, making that country the single biggest contributor to climate change, again, by far. So it bears the biggest responsibility of any country. But you are right, it's a worldwide problem.