i think the point here is that a manifesto or a document should come out of collective practice within an organisation, not via mixing together labels from the ideology store
Human Rights in the Soviet Union by Albert Szymanski touches a little bit on political organisation, though its mainly about social and economic rights. Workers' Participation in the Soviet Union by Mick Costello is specifically about workers. Theres also The CPSU in a Soviet Election Campaign, which is a short article on the party participation in elections.
Between 1936 and 1977 is also the period of the "Stalin" constitution, so you can also read it to learn more about the system. I also always recommend Red Plenty by Francis Spufford, even though its historical fiction, because its so good at showing post-war USSR.
that's not how advocacy works. you have to at least have a target demographic / group. not to mention a campaign plan etc etc. then you can start looking for the tools that fit your advocacy.
i think you should rather just look into the history of the region, read some books on the topic, apply materialist analysis. you should not take everything at face value, neither from putin nor from a propagandist doc
Check out bell hooks. The will to change is specifically on misogyny. I don’t think Federici or de Beauvoir will help you because they are more about systems of patriarchy rather than individual acts of misogyny.
i havent heard of India being considered imperialist, it is just more neutral towards the west (than Russia) + has fascist tendencies. so it wouldnt be fair to call it imperialist nor anti imperialist imho.
![starkillerfish [she/her]](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/43bbb6e7-9e1c-4ecb-a506-621fe849a7fe.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
Did anyone think that they are a charity or something?