Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SM
Posts
6
Comments
446
Joined
12 mo. ago

  • Even with LMs supposedly specialising in the areas that I am knowledgable (but by no means an expert) in, it's the same. Drill down even slightly beyond surface-level, and it's either plain wrong, or halucinated when not immediately disprovable.

    And why wouldn't it be? These things do not possess knowledge, they possess the ability to generate texts about things we'd like them to be knowledgable in, and that is a crucial difference.

  • I'm a programmer as well. When ChatGPT & Co initially came out, I was pretty excited tbh and attempted to integrate it into my workflow, which kinda worked-ish? But was also a lot of me being amazed by the novelty, and forgiving of the shortcomings.

    Did not take me long to phase them out again though. (And no, it's not the models I used; I have tried again now and then with the new, supposedly perfect-for-programming models, same results). The only edgecase where they are generally useful (to me at least) are simple tasks that I have some general knowledge of (to double theck the LM's work) but not have any interest in learning anything further than I already know. Which does occur here and there, but rarely.

    For everything else programming-related, it's flat out shit.I do not beleive they are a time saver for even moderately difficult programs. Bu the time you've run around in enough circles, explaining "now, this does not do what you say it does", "that's the same wring answer you gave me two responses ago", "you have hallucinated that function", and found out the framework in use dropped that general structure in version 5, you may as well do it yourself, and actually learn how to do it at the same time.

    For work, I eventually found that it took me longer to describe the business logic (and do the above dance) than to just.... do the work. I also have more confidence in the code, and understand it completely.

    In terms of programming aids, a linter, formatter and LSP are, IMHO, a million times more useful than any LM.

  • LMs give the appearance of understanding, but as soon as you try to use them for anything that you actually are knowledgable in, the facade crumbles.

    Even for repetitive tasks, you have to do a lot of manual checking to ensure they did not start hallucinating half way through.

  • Yeah, +1.

    I've been an avid fan of applocation launchers like rofi and dmenu on the desktop forever, and the "swipe down and immediately search" feels as close as it can get to the mobile equivalent of those.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • When I first switched to nix, I made an error copy-pasting my hashed password into a secrets file.

    Reninstalled the system 5 times, each time immediately locking myself out, almost

    Managing ~35 machines without issues now though.

  • FWIW, Lidarr works the worst out of the arr stack for me too. I don't know if there's just not enough well indexed material in my sources or what, but yeah, not great.

    If your entire experience with the arr stack has been Lidarr so far, give it another shot! Sonarr and Radarr work absolutely perfectly. It's just such a nice feeling to open Jellyfin (or I guess Plex) on the TV and go "oh nice new episode is out!"

  • Darf ich ehrlich sein? Ich fände das besser, als 4 Jahre gaslighting. Genau so scheiß Politik, aber nicht frustriert immer wieder aufs neue argumentieren müssen dass die kooperieren.

    Natürlich hoffe ich trotzdem das keins von beidem passiert. Aber Vertrauen hab ich nicht da rein.

  • Wird der die nächsten 4 Jahre nach jeder einzelnen Abstimmung sagen "ich kann nix dafür, dass die afd mit uns gestimmt hat! Wir haben keine offizielle Kooperation! Brandmauer steht! Ist Zufall, dass wir halt der gleichen Meinung sind!"

    ...ja, oder?

  • Sorry, I should have gone more into the actual belief. For her it was less of an "if I make a decision that leads to my death in this universe, there surely is a parallel universe where I did not!", it was "if I die in this universe, thanks to an infinite multiverse, there must be one where I spontaneously start exisitng with all my exact memories from the previous life".

  • Oof that reminds me...

    When my partner and I had already been living together for a while, we had one of those "cuddle on the couch and deeptalk" days, when she confided that, while she was not religious in any traditional sense of the word, she felt immensely comforted by the thought of an infinite multiverse existing.
    "If there's an infinite amount of parallel worlds, then I choose to believe that even if I die here, life goes on in another world, so in a sense my being and existence do not simply vanish completely. Same for you! And hey, even if we both die, we'll get to continue living together in some version of the infinite multiverse!"

    It was clearly a thought that comforted her a lot, and at the same time a rather intimate belief that she chose to share with me. So, like the idiot I am, I stared her in the face blankly and went "There's an infinite amount of numbers between 0 and 1, and none of them are 2".

    I really regret that. She let me know later that that one sentence shattered the belief for her. Which is sad, because it's such an innocent thought. There's no religious behaviors or conditions or rituals attached to it, it's just comforting.

  • I have been scrolling on the front page for a couple of minutes now, and I was going to write that it's literally all conspiracy theories, but that's not true, there's also some "sponsored" posts AKA ads sprinkled in.

    What a sad joke.

    If you think the fediverse is too centralized, you can always host your own instance. You get all the same "free speech" benefits (plus no free-speech ban on drugs and porn), without having to put one foot into that cesspit of a site.

    Edit: oh, and that has to be the worst moderation system ever devised - at least if you are a woman or any kind of minority. Good fucking luck in finding a random jury of users who will ever, ever ban a racist or sexist piece of shit on a platform like this. Come to think of it, that's probably the idea and justification behind the system: being able to loudly proclaim "we have a democratized ban system ensuring moderator overreach is impossible!" does make a great dogwhistle for "you can be a terrible human on here, don't worry"

  • Yeah "Delicious in Dungeon" makes no sense in the same way "Attack on Titan" makes little sense. HOWEVER.

    That narrator going "Mmmmh, Delicious in Dungeon! Ooooohh, delicious in dungeon!" at least once per episode is just absolute perfection and I wouldn't have it any other way.