There's some sampling bias at play because you don't hear about the less flashy examples. I use machine learning for particle physics, but there's no marketing nor outrage about it.
Almost as if it's artificial.
Sure, but people seem to buy into that very buzz wordyness and ignore the usefulness of the technology as a whole because "ai bad."
Surely. But if your purpose it to affect the ultimate outcome with the electoral college in mind, then this is not a good choice. It's not exactly a swing state. Far from it.
I mean, absentee votes in Montana are not a very good target if it was intentional.
"It was a bit of a bust, haha. But the six of us had a good time. How was your weekend?"
I think it's pie with the same amount of steps.
I'll scratch it or lose it, and if I don't, I'll have a pile of plastic crap I don't want. I'm not really worried about digital media being taken away, and I could find it again if need be.
Gerrymandering affects the house. It's the electoral college that affects the presidential election.
I dunno, I typically made friends with the people I worked on projects and studied with.
More about not making any sense than honesty, honestly. But it's pretty fun, dive deeper.
Could have sub for popular_opinion and automatically cross-post submissions that are under 50% to unpopular_opinion.
Then you could see how popular an unpopular opinion is.
Seriously, their bias is right in the name.
They are not fully in control because the ruling didn't say that affirmative action couldn't be a government requirement. It said that a policy that enables affirmative action violates the constitution.
So, they are no longer asking applicants about race or ethnicity information. But they are expanding recruitment and financial aid to prioritize low income students.
I'm not agreeing with the court ruling, just clarifying the false representation of the issue with regard to the school.
Old widow and a g pro. Not exactly a deep cut, but it was really fun!