ricecake @ ricecake @sh.itjust.works

Posts

6

Comments

2,191

Joined

2 yr. ago

The police have gotten very effective at quashing effective movements, and we've had decades of concerted effort to make it more difficult to organize and to get people to actually oppose the concept of effective resistance in their own favor.
People with power don't want people threatening to destabilize that power. People who set media narratives need access to people with power, and so they don't want to convey those destabilizing factors positively.
This makes people view them negatively, if they even see them at all.

America has never had a culling of the rich and powerful. The closest we got was when we decided to exchange a rich and powerful person far away for a few closer to home.
As such, there's no weight given to the morale of anyone who isn't rich and powerful.
Reporters, politicians and businesses people have never had to put their heads in the scale when making choices.

Android kinda has that. There's call screen where the phone asks why you're calling and the user can follow along, potentially pressing a button to prompt for more details, to pickup, or to send the caller to voicemail.

It's integrated into the spam blocking. Usually spam calls just don't say anything so it hangs up on them, so I don't actually know how it would handle a human telemarketer.

I can read why you're calling in 3 seconds and it takes no mental energy if I don't care. If I talk to you I need to use significantly more mental energy and it's more disruptive to anything I was focusing on. The people I least want to talk to are the most likely to call, and are the ones who will be the least direct about why they're calling and waste the most of my time.

Not wanting to talk to you on the phone is not the same as not communicating. The vast majority of phone calls are basically someone saying "stop what you're doing, what I want to talk to you about is more important" and they're wrong.

Yes. The most charitable interpretation is that people have forgotten the lessons of the 1900s and think that a replay of Herbert Hoover is a good idea.

Last time it took a few decades and destroying countless lives to fix. Hopefully the cost is lower this time.

Of sorts indeed. For a lot of people the military is the only option we give as a way out of difficult circumstances, and the educational grants and such are potentially their only way see a better future.
It's rough but it's unfortunately the best path our society has seen fit to build.
God forbid we invest in underserved communities or provide general education grants.

Well, clearly the court only said that the three judges in question had to stop issuing nationwide injunctions, right? The others haven't done anything yet, and since each case has to be tried independently....

So fucking stupid. And a clear signal that they're going to start deporting citizens now, since even though I can show my birth certificate, I can't show my parents, or my parents parents and so on. Trace it back far enough and everyone will run into an ancestor that they can't prove the citizenship of. "Oops, your citizenship is actually invalid! We're sending you to a central American prison".

This isn't the best or most popular way to do it, but: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/install

There is a way built into windows to deploy and use Linux from inside windows.

It's not the most pure experience, but it's a way to make sure you have something like a feel for how some parts work before jumping in any deeper.

A bootable USB stick is another way to try before you commit. Only reason I might suggest starting with trying it the other way first is in case you run into issues connecting to the Internet or something you won't feel totally lost. Having to keep rebooting back into windows if you have a problem can be frustrating, so getting a little familiarity with a safety line can help feel more confident.

Issues with a USB boot are increasingly uncommon, as an aside. Biggest issue is likely to be that USB is slow, so things might take a few moments longer to start.

From there, you should be pretty comfortable doing basic stuff after a little playing around. Not deep mastery, but a sense of "here are my settings", "my files go here", "here's how I fiddle with wifi", "here's how I change my desktop stuff". At that point a dual boot should work out, since you'll be able to use the system to find out how to do new things with the system, and also use it for whatever, in a general sense.

If it's working out, you should find yourself popping back into windows less and less.

Genes do play a role in dental health. Water flouridation very effectively does a better job providing better results to more people with great reliability. That's backed by a huge amount of data.

1. people do have different teeth.
2. are you sure? Keep in mind that the most common reason to not flouridate water is because natural flouride levels are sufficient.

If insurance companies had their way we'd have universal healthcare and mandatory private insurance that was allowed to deny claims freely.
They get $800 a month, and replace their entire claims department with a system that automatically denies claims and forwards the bill to the government. You're legally obligated to receive preventative care and live a long and productive life to maximize the number of payments you make to them.
Obviously dental, vision, skin, bones, organs and mental health are an additional $250 a month each, mandatory, and provide no coverage.

It's absolutely abhorrent behavior. The absolute most I would expect out of the teacher is a friendly confirmation that the student wasn't sitting because they just zoned out. Even that kinda seems like a waste of time.

No, I think it's saying that opensuse breeds Linux distros, and is trying to get Debian and arch to rub cloacas.

Also, opensuse once bit off a little chunk of someone's ear.

Oh, I totally know there's been a lot of politics in the Foss community and that some of the people are nasty, I'm just flabbergasted that someone would try to connect such disparate things.
I can comprehend a Nazi Foss enthusiast having opinions on race and on window managers. It's when they start having racist opinions on window managers that it all flies out the window. It's like being opposed to copper plumbing because it's too Norwegian.

Just a case of seeing irrational people who act irrationally act irrationally in a new way and being shocked that the irrationality doesn't follow a pattern or stay in topic.

If we're getting into practical realities it would probably pop and smolder long before it got fully charged. Capacitance is how much charge something will hold per volt. Doesn't say anything about how much charge it holds before catching on fire. :)

Technically correct. The best kind of correct. :)

I basically solved for shotgun, confirmed in was in the ~100V range and disregarded every other consideration for actually doing it.
I'm pretty sure most hand sized capacitors would just pop if you actually tried to put that much in them.

Depends on the voltage it's charged with, but household current would give it more energy than a shotgun has.

Realistically one would not do that unless you were dealing with something industrial. You would use them otherwise for things like dampening lower voltage systems that need a lot of current.

Closer to the danger level of someone holding two exposed wires plugged into the wall.

Ugh. people can suck sometimes. I can comprehend the concept of bigotry and all that, but it just deeply does not make sense to me. And I think I'm ultimately okay with not being able to empathize with actual hatred.

I'm just confused. Like, how would someone even connect Linux software to those topics?
I totally believe you that they do, and I'm not actually interested in hearing messed up shit, I'm just...

If you asked me which topics were unlikely to have bizarre vile messaging I would have listed window managers and init systems pretty high in the list.

It's more that it's evidence that a reasonable person could doubt. It's the prosecutors job to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense needs to convince a reasonable person that you might not have done it.
If there's other evidence phone location and activity data could be argued to be faked, but in isolation a reasonable person could doubt that someone faked their phone activity and location.

The court isn't interested in exonerating people, it's only interested in arguments supporting guilt and finding holes in them. It's why they don't find you innocent, only "not guilty". You don't argue that you're innocent, you argue that the reason they say you're guilty is full of holes.

It's different objectives. Russia is interested in taking territory and inciting fear. Ukraine is interested in self defense and instilling war fatigue. Both of them need people to feel unsafe and vulnerable, and to actually destroy soldiers and hardware.

The US, on paper, wants to prevent Iran from having a nuclear weapon. Realistically they want to make a show of force for internal politics.
Neither of those requires radioactive material to be hit by explosives.
Iran needs to show that you can't bomb them without retaliation. They also need to not anger the country hosting the US military base, and also to not do something that causes the US to strike with significant force.

So the US can announce it's plans and both make a show for internal reasons and also setback any ambition that Iran has towards a weapon.
Iran has to hit something otherwise it's an unacceptable show of weakness, but hitting actual US territory would be suicide. Nearby bases are a good choice but require coordination with the host nation. "I'm not shooting at your house, I'm shooting at the person in your living room" is a hard sell to make if you want to keep peace with the homeowner and you don't give them any warning. Additionally, doing too much actual damage to the base can trigger further retaliation, which you want to avoid.

Also, the US has a pretty comprehensive surveillance system. It's difficult to move large amounts of material from a place being watched from space without it being followed, even more so if there are drones involved.

Different objectives call for different tactics. Ukraine and Russia need fear and surprise for theirs, and Iran and the US don't.