rice @ rice @lemmy.org Posts 0Comments 161Joined 2 wk. ago
5 years ago there were entire subreddits of bot only discussions while they were training. Do you know of those? We had tons of discussions on them. This started before the LLM craze too.
wow that is hilarious https://www.reddit.com/r/findareddit/comments/14kxk9e/please_help_me_find_the_reddit_that_only_lets/
do not see the ones predating some LLMs though but anyway yea I think it was obvious what was coming
Well people do get it, which is why the video wasn't linked, so they can't get it.
oh you can run the https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin-mpv-shim and then just install MPV
No it isn't & I didn't say anything about IQ.
He said
he started to realize that what he was taught simply isn’t lining up with reality.
to realize this is a man of high logic
the software he is installing in his pic is a snap wrapper over a proprietary, closed source torrent thing. So don't even bother.
that's why you just compile your .flatpak file and say "gl suckas, works 4 me :^)"
oh wow that's way worse than the crappy one he said in his actual post.. He said a totally different software. He's trying to run several things on this machine lol
whoa look at mr rich boy here with a drive that costs more than $2 on ebay
he said it's a thin client so it is likely soldered on but almost all of them do have m.2 support. But many of them are actual sata m.2 so don't accidentally buy a nvme m.2. easy enough to check which yours supports
don't wanna be mean to any demographic but it's literally the windows gamer converts. Not all of them though. At the same time that kills the other linux elites of "you don't compile gentoo from scratch on every system?" so..
this? https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/Shortwave
I think on a system like that you shouldn't even run a GUI or a window manager at most. What is the service that is actually using though, it links to this https://www.radio-browser.info/ I guess I see you can play stations directly from that. It seems it makes more sense to use like lynx browser or something to just browse that website directly.
I've clicked like 10 of them they are all mp3 or aac. mpv or vlc can decode those on the command line and play it with using like 15-100mb of space on your storage. Like this random station for example https://stream-uk1.radioparadise.com/aac-320
all in all your total install should be like 400mb
damn you got ubuntuwashed, not sure if that is worse than windowashed or not
or statically compiling literally everything then you got 50 copies of the same thing like windows & macos!
It's very efficient for what it does. and your programs will actually open.
There are no lossless copies of any movie that have ever been released to the public
Delivery formats (h265, h264, h263 etc) are compressed and lossy.
You need to do 2 pass encoding. You should also not use CRF. You should pick a bitrate for the file size you want. Do a first pass which analyzes the video to see which sections require more data, and then run a second pass which will give high bitrate to more action scenes and lower bitrate to the credits and slower talking scenes.
Some action scenes require 5 times more data to look as good as a talking dinner scene, you couldn't even notice the quality difference but the bitrate requirement is literally 5 times more.
You also need to use the slow preset and use x265 if you're doing this to archive the stuff forever. Do it once and do it right.
Lossy to lossy generally doesn't matter, that is why people transcode over the web on their media players and the video seems fine, they are doing lossy to lossy on the fly there. What is actually stupid is saving media that is 100gb that you ALWAYS have to transcode to play, so no matter what you're ramping up your wattage use to play a file. This is also why 99.9999% of consumed media is compressed, you can't play it otherwise. Internet would explode too.
Likewise can size a jpeg down from 4000kb to 1000kb and it'll likely be almost identical and good enough for most cases. There are certainly zero handheld devices you'd be able to notice it on.** If you size the 4000kb to 40kb now there will be an actual noticeable difference. There are different levels to all of this. **
Similarly a 100mb wav file should be a 10mb mp3 and you can't tell the difference. You couldn't even tell the difference with a 3mb mp3 file.
it will result in visible and audible distortion
This is completely wrong, it "might" be visible is accurate. The actual answer is "that depends"
If a file is 5000kbps and you use 3000kbps you now have 25-50% savings like he just said. Nothing is overestimated, you can encode to w/e you want. This is how lossy encoding works, for everything.