Students - all non-wage-earners - shouldn't be able to vote by your logic?
I don't know how you could possibly derive that conclusion from what they said, unless you lack a very basic understanding of how to interpret logical statements.
Ah man, I've been playing various Trackmania titles since 2013 but I still struggle with some of the campaign author medals and my placements are only around top 5-10% of players. Better than average sure, but not "exponentially" [sic] despite years of experience :(
Lol und ich dachte erst das war vielleicht wirklich Zufall, aber als ich dann im Schaufenster das "Big Döner Energy" und "Get Stuffed" sah war klar dass der Laden sich das schon genau so als Marke ausgesucht hat.
Setting aside how needlessly passive-aggressive your comment is– most people don't care about the world at large. They care about their family, their social circle, their tribe/in-group, but not the world at large. Otherwise climate change wouldn't be as big of an issue in the first place.
It's because humans have rated potential responses and ChatGPT has been trained to generate the kind of responses that most consistently get preferred rating. You can imagine how an AI trained to say what people want to hear would become a people pleaser.
I think they are just different designs with different use cases in mind. I use Safari tab groups and find them very helpful to quickly get back to specific work contexts, sort of like just separate browser windows that I can close and bring back as needed.
Having only used Chrome's tab groups briefly I think I recall them being more of an ad-hoc organizational tool for existing tabs in the window. In that case, I think Chrome's tab groups are closer to the name, whereas Safari tab groups are a separate concept that could have maybe used a different name.
Yeah, I know. I was thinking mostly of the plans to drill for more oil, but overall of course car dependency (including electric cars) impacts so many other aspects of life as well
The same people saying federal government shouldn't meddle in state issues are now saying the state should meddle in local issues... obviously because the federal and local levels aren't conservative enough for their tastes. How anyone could keep up with the mental gymnastics required to defend these inconsistent, contradictory hypocrites is beyond me.
Sorry, you're right. I should have read on before accusing you of being too cynical. I guess the real joke is me thinking a British person could make a point without somehow being transphobic about it.
There isn't? It doesn't make sense to me why this entirely unrelated political statement would behas been weaved into an article about environmental issues. Granted, I don't know the author or their leanings. But I think it's pretty clear that this is meant to say "Do you tie your identity to your car" , and that is how I read it until the similarity to the "one joke" was pointed out by the OP.
I mean, that's clearly not what this is..? There's no need to undermine a valid point about how strongly sone people are emotionally attached to a vehicle, just because it happens to remind you of a different social issue.
Edit: ok, I should have read the actual article, with the next line it's clearly intentional. I still don't understand why the author felt the need to bring this up in what I thought was otherwise a valid criticism of car culture, but that was just me giving them too much benefit of the doubt. Sorry!
Alle machen sich hier lustig weil es so offensichtlich sei, aber auch das Nachweisen von "offensichtlichen" Tatsachen ist ein wertvoller Teil der Wissenschaft. Jetzt hat man eine ganz konkrete Zahl, die man denen entgegnen kann, die meinen "das bringt doch eh nichts" (o.Ä). Vorher hätte man nur mit wenig aussagekräftige Anekdoten oder Vermutungen kontern können.
Damn you weren't kidding. I always felt the swipe in Voyager to feel a little "off" but could never tell why. It was the haptic feedback! Now it feels just as natural as it used to in Apollo
As a second-year uni student I applied for a tutoring job at the university. I was still underage by a few weeks when the semester started, which caused them a bit of extra bureaucratic hassle when I was supposed to sign the contract.
After that, they've added a question "are you going to be at least 18 when starting the position" to the application form :D
I don't know how you could possibly derive that conclusion from what they said, unless you lack a very basic understanding of how to interpret logical statements.