Rav Sha'ul @ ravshaul @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

1

Comments

78

Joined

6 mo. ago

Why does it never go the other way and your side screams censorship when there are restrictions saying not allowed to mention climate change, not allowed to mention socialism or Marxism, not allowed to mention covid?

You blocking me does not qualify as censorship due to individual liberties. I can agree that if someone is frequently complaining about trans people, even some people who agree will grow tired of the negativity. There is a problem trying to public promote a service as an established service and attract new users, and then to say "No, we don't allow your kind in here, you are only allowed to agree with every word we say", that starts to look like a bait and switch scam and pushing dictatorial censorship.

Do an internet search for "mastodon censorship" and read through 10 different search results.

Do people have a right to disagree with you? When you comment on any subject or topic, whatever it might be, do others have right to not support what you believe in? No marriage or serious relationship can last with restrictions on personal thought. Successful marriages must have room for disagreements.

I think your first sentence of reply has a mistake, maybe a word is missing, it is not clear. Or am I not understanding correctly?

Why is it always white people who only speak English that calls people racist?

I do not see upvotes or downvotes. If there are lots of downvotes I will never see it.

The entire fediverse is built on censorship of thought and opinion because no server is allowed to join the fediverse that allows posts criticizing transgenderism.

What is the point of the fediverse if servers ban posts of unapproved opinions and banning wrongthink?

Which means Canadians will lose their jobs, they will be out of work, and some companies in Canada will not hire because there's not enough sales to hire anybody new.

Why not ban American imports, ban American passports, close American embassies, order American businesses and schools to leave the country?

Preference for AnySoftKeyboard.

Why is there so many censored posts about keyboard apps?

That title is ideological indoctrination pushing fanaticism.

Canadian people don't care about others as much as they claim they do. Would you vote for government to take away more of your money, pay a higher sales tax, higher government fees, higher income tax for all people, to pay for helping needy people, or would you vote to eliminate income tax and you give away your own cash to help people around you?

I tried a GPS app with wi-fi and it wouldn't work without SIM card installed or phone service.

The Liberals wanted Poilievre legally silenced because his arguments were winning against the Liberal talking points. So if he is now forced to stay silent then that allows the Liberals to lie to the people, lie to the public, and Poilievre can't explain why what they are saying is false. But with him not getting security clearance he can point out falasies in their statements and argue against their logic and there is no legal danger for anything he says because he has not seen anything.

If Poilievre sees some secret information and fires a member of his own Conservative party that is mentioned in the information, Poilievre violated the security act and legally he's out. Without that security clearance he has full reign as leader without confines or legal restrictions.

That is self-aggrandizement.

I wonder if the reporters appreciated asking questions to someone who can stay on topic explain the answer and form whole sentences.

He rejected the security clearance because if he mentions anything they show him he can be charged criminally on national scecurity grounds, even as a sitting member of parliment he can be charged and his seat would be in jeopardy if he talks.

The Liberals push for him to get a security clearance was all a tactic to force him into silence under threat of arrest if he mentions what he reads or sees.

What research papers have been published with all variables showing that face coverings prevent infection, and people who did not wear anything suffered permanent health damage? I'm not asking statements, but published papers that definitely show that wearing something prevented spreading, and people who didn't caused the spreading. A news story is not acceptable, only scientic journals or papers to read through the methodology and results.

I will second the others that only suggest Signal or a variant of Signal like Langis or Molly. Everybody has each other's phone numbers, go with Signal so people don't need any other contact information.