PowerCrazy @ PowerCrazy @lemmy.ml

Posts

3

Comments

2,115

Joined

2 yr. ago

Bernie is the compromise.

Fischer clarified that BDS’s ideology is based on “explicit denial of Israel’s right to exist.”

Well he is correct about that. But not sure how that is unconstitutional, unless the German consitution has some extremely problematic language in it, in which case it probably needs to be throw out.

This dude fucking sucks and doesn't understand the purpose of the 2nd amendment. Stopped reading there.

https://www.forbes.com/advisor/taxes/salt-tax-deduction/

It's just this. Not anything to do with how local taxes work.

But again, nothing is precluding an elected official from also organizing.

Neither is this boon dongle, just like "star wars" before it.

Why do you say that? It's a metal that can be hammered extremely thinly, gold leaf etc.

Pretty sure this is literally what Denmark signed up for? I'm not sure where the "alarm" is coming from.

If you aren't in office your "committed party" may as well be a d&d group, you'd have more fun while accomplishing exactly the same thing.

Entryism largely doesn’t work.

Eh. While that is true if you want to change an established party, it isn't true if you want improve society somewhat. As an elected-official at any level, you have more power and influence then a citizen, and no matter how little power you have, your presence in the body politic means that you have access to others in that body. There are plenty of things that a government does that require it's elected members to agree to do. As one of those members you have leverage that can be used to help make good things happen, or to soften the bad things that happen, and these are opportunities you don't have if you aren't a part of that system.

Plus you can absolutely "party build" while being an elected official.

Running as a democrat to get ballot access is fine imo. Because once yo uare in office, you don't have to stay a Dem, and there is nothing the party can do to "force" you to stay a dem. They can and will primary you, but with incumbancy advantage, that costs them way more then beating you as an independent running against the dem candidate the first time.

e: If you are in a red-area, absolutely run as a republican. Same argument applies.

Dems literally only talk about tax deductions for rich fucks that will absolutely not help anyone else. It's absurd in the comical sense.

Nah, the joke is the military generals who have been in charge for so long are rubes and can't even do corruption right. The Boeing shareholders/board members who are being paid these billions of dollars are the ones enjoying $4000 dollar wine and imported Kobe Beef steaks with the lobbyists

Overcomplication is a feature of privatized military production because it’s far more efficient at creating profits.

100% this. But my question is that since the US is the largest weapon dealer in the world, both in terms of dollar amount and number of planes etc, who the hell are buying these things and why? Surely when you are purchasing something that costs billions of dollars you have to account for the on-going support costs too? Most countries don't have the luxury of ignoring costs do they?

I'm not sure why anyone would be "panicking" about the loss of a the latest US boondongle? The US MIC hasn't been building things for fighting performance or efficiency since at least the end of the cold war, and probably before. An f-35 "almost" being shotdown just sound like boeing get's another trillion dollars to build an "f-35+."

All the career generals get to spend the next 10years instructing their minions to write intellectually bankrupt papers about how the US needs to engage our "strategic partners" to match this "new threat". Honestly they could probably just copy the slurry of papers that were written after 9/11 about "low-tech threats" that the next generation of arms needs to deal with. Meanwhile the generals will be taken to the Capital Grill for their weekly lobbyist meetings where they get to drink $40 glasses of wine and eat $100 steaks because they are the most basic, worthless and craven people that our shitty political system has put in charge of trillions of dollars over their careers.

Regardless those people aren't "panicking."

Well you'd be 100% incorrect. If you watch the video, you can see the ship is going backwards, it wasn't intended to pass under the bridge at all, because it obviously couldn't.

I'm kind of curious how stockfish would react to only trading a knight a for a pawn now.

So in the good ol' days when parts of the american democracy could still be claimed to exist for the good of the citizenry, there was a supreme court ruling that said the right to travel (not drive a car but as a passenger, by foot, train and by extension plane) without ID was fundamental to interstate commerce and the concept of a nation. Unfortunately the Bush admin with the help of 9/11 passed an unconstitutional law, and since American Jurisprudence only cares about business interests, we have this trash law with trash people defending it.

What lack of theory does to a mfer.

In America there is no difference.