papertowels @ papertowels @lemmy.one

Posts

1

Comments

999

Joined

2 yr. ago

To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of children; to earn the appreciation of honest critics and endure the betrayal of false friends; to appreciate the beauty; to find the best in others; to leave the world a bit better, whether by a healthy child, a garden patch Or a redeemed social condition; to know even one life has breathed easier because you have lived. This is to have succeeded!

• Ralph Waldo Emerson

Not OP, but I believe this is in reference to the election, and the "both sides"-ing of genocide.

Additionally, the average brain is about 1300 grams. 0.5% of 1300 is 6.5 grams, and plastic credit cards weigh roughly 5 grams.

0.5% is really hard for me to visualize. A credit card in everyone's brain is unfortunately easy.....

Fun fact, the average adult brain also has a credit cards worth of plastic inside. So that bacon has some company!

I’ve made NO false assumptions

Article states:

It is one of the largest crisis response programs in the country, with 130 employees.

Your assumption: they have always had 130 employees.

Reality: In FY 21, they had funding for 18 people, in FY 22 they had the funding for 61 people.

That sure does seem like an assumption that turned out to be false.

So when I said “even if you 8x”… I didn’t account that there could be additional workload?

That's a good point - how did you come up with that number? Also, how did you come up with an acceptable number of diverted calls? Did you compare the value to those of the programs peers?

Taking even your infographic where they claim that they've done 3296 calls .

Okay, let's make sure our homework is done again. How many people do you know we're employed at this time? Should your analysis be qualified as a worst case value? How many folks do you think should be on call?

Moving goalposts

Lmao, it can say a lot about your approach if real world corrections to the initial values are considered moving goalposts. If your focus is on being "right" in the context of the article regardless of being wrong in the context of real life, I can see that being upsetting.

Here's the thing. You're the one asserting that it's inefficient, so it's really up to you to make sure your evidence and reasoning is right.

You keep asking for analysis from me, but I don't need to provide my own analysis to point out the false assumptions you've made in yours, resulting in potentially misleading analysis. The correct action to take is to either correct the assumptions, or state that those are assumptions you are making in your analysis.

The fundamental thread behind your analysis is that 130 employees don't divert enough calls to justify their existence, when in reality you didn't realize that those calls aren't the sole responsibility the group has. So how much water does the analysis even hold?

I'm not saying you're a bad person. I'm saying you're looking to "offer a more realistic view of what this actually is" before having a full understanding of what it actually is. The acs page linked to the article has a transparency page with regular reports like the one I shared. I'd consider those to be good primary resources. Go ham!

I've replied to another one of your comments.

There are many reasons why I think you're analysis is misleading.

This infographic has more relevant info from 2023.

Also note that taking calls isn't the only thing the group is responsible for. They do things like needle pickups, homeless outreach, etc additionally, acs doesn't only respond to 911 calls:

While responding to 911 calls is our primary focus, ACS responders will be dispatched through additional methods, including referrals, self- dispatch, and 311 tickets. ACS will also respond to calls from 988, the national behavioral health crisis hotline, when it launches in 2022.

Taking some good news and immediately trying to portray it in a bad light is not exactly the way to push society forward. Actively looking to portray the start of such programs as "inefficient" and being a waste of taxpayer dollars can discourage other such programs from starting, which is a shame especially if the analysis wasn't fully informed.

You've taken their current employee count, as the biggest department of its kind, and assumed they started with that on day 1, which is an unrealistic assumption to make without evidence.

That said I am very concerned with the influence he undoubtedly will have with our space asset acquisition policies.

But when the ones we oppose, the ones who are carrying out the war of genocide, and the ones who stand to directly benefit are absolutely enamored with a decision, it can give pause to those of us sitting in our ivory tower armchairs as to the impact of our decision to those who face the consequences more directly.

BAH GAWD IT'S UNIVERSES BEYOND WITH A STEEL CHAIR.

for anyone confused, the company behind magic recently pledged to have sets from all sorts of IP in all competitive formats.

Your legolas can shoot down an Optimus prime, only to be replaced by a wolverine.

Imo anyone considering a Tesla won't really care about the price and quality, for the reasons you describe. They're there for the brand.

Apparently Tesla's on board with this. Their thinking, which I think is correct, is that the rebate benefits other manufacturers more since Tesla is much more established as an EV brand.

Idk what the exact definition of a full lock in is, but if you have to break a window to get someone out I'd think it still qualifies since the locks were all engaged.

Time to justify it by giving your nephew a punch card to YOUR climbing wall!

Ah, the roy videogame from Rick and Morty

Do you have any rock climbing gyms near you? Could get a punch card to one.

Terry Pratchett posited that the shortest measurable amount of time is the New York second - the time between the traffic light turning green and the car behind you honking.

Corrected! Too early in the morning :)