Skip Navigation

Posts
8
Comments
2,644
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • But I can also view that content without licensing it...

    If I pay someone to create an image in a style of another artist, and they look at that artists work, have I stolen that artwork?

  • Instead, you find a way to view the content without giving them money

    Right here is where you lost me. How does AI offer you that ability?

  • The images still exist in their original locations, they have not been stolen.

  • Turns out it was an NY Times article

    No it wasn't, you're lying again.

    needing someone else to spoon-feed you the exact baby food you want isn't a great way to go through life

    Asking people for sources for their outlandish claims is "being spoonfed baby food" now.

    Jesus, you'll really do anything but just admit to being wrong. It's so cringe.

    Look, you came into this thread trying to dunk on people, got proven wrong, pivoted and doubled down, got proven wrong again and you just can't seem to handle that fact. We both know it. Just admit it and take the L.

  • Sounds much more similar to something like NOSTR. I've always like the simplicity of using a keypair as an identity.

  • From what I can tell, the message was that there was a final date to submit claims to be reimbursed, giving dealers the opportunity to stop offering the incentive and shore up any outstanding claims for exactly that reason.

    They just didn't expect dealers to be backlogging months worth of these claims for no apparent reason.

  • There are computers purpose-built for running Linux, where all the drivers work out of the box.

    Might be worth considering for your next upgrade.

  • Misusing them in what weigh? Like using an uncorrect word? Or using a word that has a different consternation than the one they meant to use?

  • Trust me bro, I was right, I just don't feel like proving it.

    Fragile little ego. So pathetic.

  • Right, because even though we both know you were wrong, you're too fragile to admit it.

  • So we're clear, your position that all AI is inherently evil and useless is absurd.

    It's made all the moreso by the fact that you're clearly just parroting talking points you don't actually understand.

  • copyright is a type of intellectual property, an area of law distinct from that which covers robbery or theft, offenses related only to tangible property.

  • Piracy is copyright infringement, not theft.

  • Every AAA game company's have been for 30 years and still currently are arguing this in courts all the time.

    Are you sure about that? Because it isn't theft, it's copyright infringement.