mindlesscrollyparrot @ mindlesscrollyparrot @discuss.tchncs.de

帖子

0

评论

247

加入于

2 yr. ago

Well, the children don't have a choice, so I assume you're talking about the choice to target the militants there and not in another place.

Yes, specifically militants who are fathers.

Hamas uses phones, hence the "Where's Daddy?" attack, which is not directed at tunnels. It's more-or-less designed to hit civilians. The clue is in the name.

That isn't the explanation the article gives. Punch 1 of the 1-2 punch is that heavier rain - also caused by climate change - allows grass to grow higher, and that is why there is more fuel.

I guess it's quite easy to test though: we had extensive wildfires last year; those areas should be safe from wildfires this year.

He isn't scared of being stabbed. He just doesn't want to go to Clacton.

Yes, we would expect Hamas to say something like that. On the other hand, the Israeli military also said this was not acceptable behaviour.

"This is a serious incident that is not in line with [Israeli army] values and what is expected of [Israeli army] soldiers," the Israeli military said in a statement. "The incident is under review."

I mean, it did happen under a Conservative government, and Sunak defended his failure to declare an interest by saying that he wasn't privy to his wife's business interests.

It's quite possible that it's that very scandal that prompted Starmer to seek additional guidance.

If you have listened to Electric Avenue, you will understand why Eddie Grant may have been particularly outraged by Trump using it.

Well, there you are again. You said "my questioning of what you claimed". That isn't self reflection. If you aren't asking in bad faith, you need to spend more time on your wording.

The downvotes are because it seemed that you were asking in bad faith. You said "I believe it is true", but now you say (admit) that you were questioning it.

They say "she was being fed the questions". What would be the point of being fed the questions while you are on stage?!

I know that what they really mean is that she was being fed the answers. It just shows exactly how little effort they put into these claims.

The attraction of Linux is precisely that it isn't one of the two 'standards'. Your working environment doesn't get determined by some product manager in a far-away office, who has a set of target users in mind, which he's given fictional names, biographies and mugshots.

Do you think that these might be some of the subpar dwellings that they're talking about: https://southamericabackpacker.com/exploring-slums-of-medellin-colombia/ ?

No, I'm not serious. Of course they don't need roofs or windows or multiple storeys. I'm just joking about that stuff.

The ones in Texas are built of a "high performance polymer concrete", so probably including cement and contributing to climate change. They appear to be single storey as well.

The things they have chosen as demonstrators have holes in the roof! They are not suitable as homes by any reasonable definition. I also think that light and security are necessary for a home. Certainly if you are trying to improve on an existing "subpar dwelling".

If they wanted to demonstrate how they can 3D print homes in rural Colombia, why didn't they print something that would be suitable to be a home in rural Colombia? They only had to load a different model into the printer, right?

Well, quite. They don't appear to have windows or doors either (doorways, yes, but not doors), and they have holes in the roof. Yet the article mentions "homes" about a million times.

It's almost like somebody who didn't have any knowledge of construction had the idea of 3D printing buildings. Probably in the shower.

I notice that they fill the walls with natural fibers by hand (see the photo) - so they must pause the printers at regular intervals and get a ladder to get up to the top parts. So even what we see isn't entirely 3D printed.

No reinforcement? What are the upper floors made of?

Runs debian unstable. Shuts down his machine every year or so.

The email says that you can do it. It doesn't say that you can do it without purchasing the upsell option.

The author mentions that some of the changes broke things, but it's a long way into the article before the word "test" appears. It's only point 6/7 of his recommendations.

Making changes with no test coverage is not refactoring. It's just rewriting. Start there.