maniclucky @ maniclucky @lemmy.world

帖子

2

评论

530

加入于

2 yr. ago

Alcoholism? Not sure on the voices.

Faraday bags make great stocking stuffers.

Makes sense now.

If it makes you feel better, a random scrabble solver website listed it as valid. Didn't cite the source but ah well.

I don't get this one... Did the spelling of weeping change?

I'm pretty sure he'd skip weeping and go straight for the whip and upending of tables.

When you opt out of the social contract, you don't get the benefits anymore. Piss is too generous.

Depends on the presenter. Some I have to go as low as 1.25 and others (thankfully rarely) 2 is not enough.

Never designed something have you? Moral arguments only work on some people, and they probably voted. Everyone else needs incentive.

Yes.

Not should. Is all you need to say. If they don't get that then being done is correct anyway

Fuck your red herring. They should've been punished too. Continue to go fuck yourself.

Really? Even though he blatantly defied the constitution and attacked a foreign state out of nowhere without approval? That isn't enough, he also needs to be stupid and easily manipulated (which he obviously is based on the mountains of evidence) before you want to hold him accountable?

Go fuck yourself.

You cannot directly compare two populations without accounting for differences in size. Doing otherwise is very bad data science. That's why it's per 100,000 and thus takes size out of the equation. Which is good. That's a confounding factor that is trivial to deal with. Given my previous observation that many US states have populations directly comparable to other countries, the "comparing states with countries" complaint goes from vaguely plausible to inane immediately.

Thank you for defining how averages work?

Source: data engineer

Because US states have populations and areas comparable to other countries. Just the US topping the charts is expected. How many states you have to get through to see other countries is interesting.

Because it isn't searching. It's printing the thing that is probabilistically "correct". There is no thought or lookup or anything that a person would do to actually be correct

How is a per-capita incarceration rate, with a reference to the superset included directly on the plot, misleading? Other than including more than El Salvador for the sake of external reference, which is almost certainly a size issue.

It's kinda like that saying: if you owe your friend $100, they have power over you. If you owe your friend $10,000, you have power over them.

It's extra fun because I can't tell which one is thinking it.

My therapist has me down as being subclinical and I feel the same, but I have the reasonable belief it was more due to childhood neglect/abuse than autism.

In theory, a really interesting (if it weren't unethical) place for llms would be elder scrolls NPCs (not touching feasibility either). Give them a two sentence background and let the immoral magic do its work. Throw in some voice creation and you'll be cooking with gas.