Vegafjord eo @ libre_warrior @lemmy.ml

Posts

30

Comments

3

Joined

4 yr. ago

I think I would have sought out anarchist communes and tailored my tool to their needs. If done well, I could have my needs met, lived comfortably and created tools that directly impacted my peers. I'd also be able to help out my commune in many other meaningful ways as well. The days would be filled with meaning instead of as a servent of the machine.

I like to swap out "ism" with "frame". In this case broism becomes broframe.

That is false. Esperanto is eurocentric. Thats true. But the reason it is so easy to learn is not because it is a merge of european languages. Rather it is because it is consistent and its many elements which by design makes the language easy to learn.

• All present tense words ends in -as, all subjectives ends with -o.
• The letters are always pronounced the same.
• The morpheme 'mal' is used a lot which creates the antonym of a word. Varma and malvarma means respectively warm and cold. Sana and malsana means respectively healthy and sick.
• Esperanto gives the speaker the -n suffix which is marking the direct object. In essence, this grants more flexibility to switch around on sentences to better fit how you want to speak the language.

In contrast, english is consistently inconsistent and thus makes it very hard to learn. The pronounciation changes depending on the words. The morphemes are inconsistent.