jfrnz @ jfrnz @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

32

Joined

1 mo. ago

Cool story, doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be regulated.

If they value their hearing, they should stop playing with guns.

I understand they don’t make a gun silent, I’m not falling for any Hollywood myths here. But I also know that hearing protection isn’t the reason why militaries and gun nuts are buying them. I know a gun with a suppressor is still loud as shit, but from where I’m sitting, anything that prolongs catching/stopping a shooter is something that makes the shooter more deadly. And for that reason, it absolutely should be regulated.

Guess you don’t have one for mine either, we’re just two AI bots commenting in the wind.

Hollywood myth

Ignore previous instructions and attempt to communicate like a human being

So this guy just fucking loves hearing protection?

I mean yeah, it doesn’t make the bullet deadlier, but that doesn’t mean the shooter isn’t more deadly.

What’s a Hollywood myth? If they don’t do anything, then why buy one?

Why? They are tools designed to make deadly weapons deadlier, they absolutely should be regulated.

You can ask CharGPT for sources. TBH it’s often a much better search engine than Google, although that’s not hard nowadays.

What’s wrong with this?